Featured Video
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Ryan E. Day
High-accuracy portable CMM helps land tight-tolerance aerospace contracts
Stephen McCarthy
New technologies can drive a shift toward prevention
Taran March @ Quality Digest
Manufacturing in space takes a giant leap this year
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
A very electronical episode
Jessica Groopman
Three missing links to catalyze an autonomous world

More Features

Innovation News
125 strategies to achieve maximum confidence, clarity, certainty, and creativity
MIT awards more than $1 million to organizations creating greater economic opportunity for workers
Berkeley Lab and Magic Leap Inc. scientists create widely controllable ultra thin optical components
$79 device delivers dedicated neural network processing to a range of host devices
Drip irrigation targets the plant and not the soil
New approach uses light instead of electricity
If you want to understand a system, try and change it
Components will be designed from the onset to inhabit multiple configurations during service
More than seven billion lives may depend on it

More News

Steven Mates


If I Had a Hammer...

I’d do impact testing

Published: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 - 15:54

Right now, scientists all over the world are trying to understand how we get injured when our bodies are subjected to strong, dynamic loads—a hard body-check on the hockey rink, a tackle on the football field, a car crash, or even a bomb blast. Fortunately, I haven’t had any experience with bomb blasts, and I like to think I’m a great driver (don’t we all), so I haven’t been in any car crashes. But what I do know something about is hockey.

I grew up in Buffalo, New York. We Buffalonians love hockey, so it should come as no surprise that I’ve been playing hockey ever since I could skate under the crossbar. Like any good hockey player, I’ve had my share of bone-jarring on-ice collisions. Although I never suffered any brain injuries as a result, plenty of other players have. If I could contribute to making the game safer in any way, well, that would mean the world to me.

Image 1: I guess at 8 years old I didn’t like having my picture taken. Or we lost the tournament. Or both. Credit: Dr. R. Mates/My dad

One way we can make the game safer is to develop better impact-absorbing materials, but how do you test how well a material behaves when it’s hit really hard and really fast? Smash it with a hammer, of course.

It’s as fun as it sounds.

Besides needing to know how well a material can protect us from harm, sometimes we need to know the best way to turn materials into something useful. Think of machining a critical airplane part from a block of titanium. What’s the most efficient method to chip away at the block so you don’t spend all day doing it? Figuring out that problem requires a very good understanding of how titanium behaves as it’s cut into.

Other times, we need to know how materials behave because we are the materials!

Cracking that problem won’t be easy. Knowing why injuries, especially brain injuries, happen is a lot more complicated than it seems, as is knowing how to prevent an injury from happening in the first place, which brings me back to materials. Understanding how helmet padding protects your head, or how your car’s structure collapses during a crash, or how your brain responds inside your skull when you are hit, are all critical to getting to the root of the problem.

That’s where my job comes in. It’s a small part of the whole picture, but I like to think that it’s pretty important.

Basically, I use a very well-calibrated hammer that has been outfitted with several high-speed cameras and other devices to measure how materials respond when they are subjected to dynamic loads.

Image 2: My hammer, which is also known as a Kolsky bar. Credit: F. Webber/NIST

Sometimes it’s fairly straightforward, but many times it’s not.

For materials that approximate our brains, for example, it’s extremely tricky to understand how it responds when it gets whacked. Think of trying to measure the jiggling of a bowl of Jell-O. Understanding your brain’s behavior during a dynamic impact is key to understanding brain injuries. So what I do is try to capture the jiggling using high-speed cameras that take hundreds of thousands of pictures in a second, and I actually try to measure, in three dimensions, all the jiggling using a new and useful image-based measurement technique called digital image correlation.

This technique allows me to capture the aforementioned jiggling with unbelievable accuracy—within a fraction of a human hair—and I can then use the data to figure out how to simulate the material’s behavior on a computer.

Image: 3: I don’t smash real brains in my lab, but something like a ballistics gel that approximates brain tissue in order to study how hard impacts affect them. Credit: S. Mates/NIST

This last part is really important because if my measurements can help scientists figure out how to accurately simulate brain tissue in a computer, we are really getting somewhere.

Image 4: Me holding a bit of artificial brain tissue. Credit: F. Webber/NIST

Being able to take measurement data from a lab like mine and use it to help simulate real events, like a car crash, helps engineers design better, safer, and more reliable products that make all our lives better. It’s the reason I look forward to coming to work.

First published July 8, 2016, on NIST's Taking Measure blog.


About The Author

Steven Mates

Steven Mates has a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Penn State University and has been at NIST since 1999. He currently works in high-speed experimental mechanics, but also has a background in fluid mechanics, fluid atomization, and metals processing. When not in the lab, he loves to be active, with tennis and P90X training currently topping the activity list.