Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Vanessa Bates Ramirez
That’s right—all 6.5 million articles
Jennifer Lauren Lee
After 30 years NIST is once again calibrating gear artifacts, which could improve electric cars
Bendta Schroeder
A new model maps developmental pathways to tumor cells
Theodore Kinni
A unique breed of entrepreneurs is creating innovative ventures without launching startups or chasing VC funding

More Features

Innovation News
1-nanometer axis resolution and less than +/– 0.002 mm line-form accuracy
An MIT researcher and her colleagues are looking to DNA to help guide the process
Entire surfaces of wafers up to 4 in. accessible for printing
Gartner survey reveals how organizations are developing their use of AI
Ph.D. student uses machine learning to expedite research on novel battery materials
Accelerating the adoption of digital twins in building industries

More News

Scott Berkun


Why the Right Change Often Feels Wrong

‘Everything looks like a failure in the middle’

Published: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 - 13:03

On Tuesdays I write about the top-voted question on “Ask Berkun.” This week’s question came from J.R., who wrote: “What is a favorite theory that you wish more people understood?”

A favorite theory that I wish was more well-known is the Satir Change Model. It’s popular in some circles, but often when I mention it in talks at events, few have seen it before. Virginia Satir was a family therapist who studied how families behave, and in particular, how they respond to change.

We like to believe change and progress are predictable, especially if we’re applying an idea we’ve used before or that is widely accepted. But according to her research (based on family behavior), and her model, even when we’re making the right change, at the right time, confusion and fear are likely.

Satir Change Model

The Satir Change Model is simple and has five parts (shown in figure 1).

Figure 1: The Satir Change Model

1. Late status quo: This is the present, where things are stable, at least in the sense that they’ve been the same way for some time.

2. Foreign element: This is Satir’s term for any change that is introduced, which could be something deliberate (e.g., a new healthy diet) or something surprising (new neighbors move in next door). It could be a new idea, process, team member, or anything. Often, people resist foreign elements, even if they come with the promise of solving a problem. People often prefer to keep doing what they have been doing (status quo), even if there are things they don’t like about the status quo, especially if they don’t have much trust in their leader or their co-workers.

3. Chaos: (IMO this is the central idea of the model). Even if you are doing everything right, and the change is the right one, volatility will rise for a time. Average performance will drop as people experiment with adjustments to incorporate the new idea. Hidden assumptions, and emotions, will be revealed, which can be painful at first. A new idea may require new conversations, redistribution of responsibilities, and more. What makes this phase challenging is it’s hard to predict how long it will take or if the path is the right one (e.g., “Do we need to keep going, or is this direction a mistake?”)

4. Transforming idea: The job of a leader is to help a team work through the chaos phase until it reaches clarity. This is challenging because each person might require different coaching, advice, support, or training to adopt the new idea. And the team as a whole may need to reform, with different roles and responsibilities. Someone with leadership skills might correctly identify a new direction, but it takes someone with people management skills to help them through the transitions that the new direction demands.

5. Practice and integration: Once the new idea is understood and adopted, finally the expected gains can be seen and progress becomes predictable; eventually, it stabilizes again as the new status quo.

The Satir Change Model isn’t predictive. It doesn’t tell you how much chaos a particular idea will generate, if any . It can’t tell you how long it will take before you find the “transforming idea.” It also can’t tell you whether the new idea you’re introducing is the right or wrong one (e.g., the chaos will never end, or performance will never recover). It’s simply a useful framework for thinking about the psychological patterns likely to arise when something changes.

Inexperienced people often confuse the chaos phase as a failure in their choice. And if they quit early, assuming “chaos” means they made a mistake, and revert back to the old ways of doing things, they likely will never have the confidence to try something that bold again. They now confuse the chaos phase with failure. This is a kind of self-inflicted learned helplessness, where the necessary cost to improve and grow is now too psychologically expensive. People and organizations can become paralyzed here because they’ve become extremely resistant to any threat of a “foreign element,” even though that’s exactly what’s needed to grow.

Some foolish people dismiss Satir’s work based on the question: “What do families have to do with workplaces or individual adult choices?” But workplaces are based on relationships, and we learn our models for how to relate to other people from... our families! Your favorite, and least favorite, co-workers learned many of their patterns of behavior from their early relationships with their parents and siblings. How we define trust, love, collaboration, friendship, and teamwork all come from our experience with the first and primary tribe in our lives.

Anuradha Gajanayaka compares the Satir model to Kanter’s Law, which states that “Everything looks like a failure in the middle.” She suggested that we “recognize the struggle of middles, give it some time, and a successful end could be in sight.”

That is a key takeaway from the Satir model. Even if you’re doing everything right in your life, or as a leader, when you try to change something, be prepared for surprises. Plan time for “chaos” in response to the change, during which it’s normal for performance to drop and for experimentation to happen until the new idea is understood, incorporated, and refined.

First published Nov. 28, 2017, on Scott Berkun’s blog.


About The Author

Scott Berkun’s picture

Scott Berkun

Scott Berkun is a bestselling author of five books and a speaker known for his work on creativity, management, and philosophy. His work has appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, The Guardian, Wired magazine, USA Today, Fast Company, and other media. His latest book, The Year Without Pants: WordPress.com & The Future of Work (Jossey-Bass, 2013) was named an Amazon.com best book of the year.



Excellent article

Nothing is constant except change.  This is a great reminder that while change can be painful, it is necessary and will hopefullly improve the status quo.