Cost for QD employees to rent an apartment in Chico, CA. $1,200/month. Please turn off your ad blocker in Quality Digest
Our landlords thank you.
Brian Lagas
Published: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 - 11:02 When most people think of lean processes, they believe the goal is to optimize things in a step-by-step approach. The result that companies using lean methods can look forward to is incremental improvements brought about by the elimination of waste. Individuals who stick with this definition often assert that lean principles oppose innovation. That’s because “innovation” is typically considered a product-based form of invention that causes disruption. Lean manufacturing is all about following well-defined processes and figuring out how to make them better. Innovation, on the other hand, usually occurs by uprooting current processes or blatantly not following them. It may appear that lean manufacturing and innovation are opposed. However, some analysts assert that when companies recognize the compatibility between lean principles and innovation they will accelerate past their competition. The basic idea is this: People who innovate have fantastic ideas, but it’s lean thinking that can turn them into realities. Companies that are familiar with the process-driven approach of lean manufacturing and are willing to become comfortable with moving more quickly and embracing experimentation have an opportunity to create competitive advantage. To illustrate how this might work, let’s look at how the tech sector is blending the two approaches to great effect. Lean thinking originated in the manufacturing sector. However, some technology companies follow an appropriated version of lean thinking, commonly called lean innovation. This typically means companies collect customer feedback and use it to discover, create, and implement new ways to deliver more value to them. Although lean innovation has a waste-reduction element, it prioritizes experimentation over elaborate, well-defined processes. Some well-known social media channels, as well as many Silicon Valley startups, embody a “fail fast” or “move fast and break things” culture that fits into lean innovation because they develop new ideas and test them rapidly. Doing this increases the likelihood they can meet customer needs before other companies do, but it doesn’t necessarily mean they will enjoy universal success. When tech companies use lean innovation, one of the main goals is to offer the value customers want, and do it before their competitors. However, they usually don’t roll out new features to everyone at the same time. Companies such as Google, Flickr, Facebook, and Etsy deploy what’s called a “dark launch.” It involves revealing new features to a small group, then getting feedback before offering them to a wider audience. One of the positive things about the nature of the internet—and social media in particular—is how companies can gather people’s opinions without officially asking for them. Once new features roll out from a popular site or company, social media feeds usually explode with comments from individuals who want to weigh in with their thoughts. Tech businesses often create official surveys, too, but the feedback starts flowing in before people fill those out. When Henry Ford applied lean manufacturing principles to the Model T, the method allowed building more than 15 million automobiles during a 19-year production run. However, one of the downsides was minimal variability in the vehicles, and it was difficult to change something as simple as the color. Using lean innovation alongside lean manufacturing allows a manufacturer to become more responsive to customer needs. If manufacturing companies start using lean innovation, they will substantially reduce the risk of creating things no one wants by listening to what customers ask for, and then delivering it. Some companies apply lean innovation by including potential customers in their research efforts. For instance, a small New Mexico company called Trotting On Innovations has invented and developed products that benefit the supplemental oxygen community, an expanding market. However, inventor Middy McFarland, proprietor of Trotting On Innovations, was looking for a better way. McFarland had attended New Mexico Manufacturing Extension Partnership programs using lean green manufacturing, value stream mapping, and the 5S philosophy for workplace organization. The New Mexico MEP encouraged inventors to practice their elevator speeches at these meetings so they will be prepared to approach people for market research. Soliciting external feedback is one example of how manufacturers can meet their goals. It’s even better if the comments come from the people who use the products every day. Just as the tech industry rolls out features to a select few, manufacturers can reach out to a user base through free samples to a restricted group of individuals. These can be people who are part of a loyalty program, or those who agree to give detailed insights about their usage experiences. When manufacturers apply lean innovation, they learn lessons by tuning into what consumers have to say. By using these resources wisely, they reduce the likelihood of spending too much time and energy developing something that’s not appropriate for the market. They will also realize that, occasionally, development that appears inefficient is actually OK. Releasing things faster might lead to more failures, but it can also fuel impactful innovation. Getting on board with lean innovation, like tech companies do, might make manufacturers balk at first. However, if they better understand how innovation can coexist with the traditional principles of lean manufacturing, they may find it’s easier to cater to customers’ needs. It’s also essential that manufacturing companies interested in lean innovation understand that minor failures are inevitable along the path to developing new features or products at a faster-than-usual pace. However, those pitfalls could also help companies overcome obstacles and improve their methods for future production based on applying lessons learned. When companies are willing to make changes in their processes and see experimentation as a good thing, they will be well on their way to using lean innovation as a competitive advantage. Connect with your local MEP Center to learn more about how lean innovation can provide your company with a competitive advantage. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Brian Lagas is the program manager for continuous improvement, Economy, Energy and Environment (E3), lean, Toyota kata, and ExporTech at the National Institute of Standards and Technology Manufacturing Extension Partnership (NIST MEP).What Manufacturers Can Learn From the Tech Sector’s Appropriation of Lean Thinking
People who innovate have fantastic ideas, but it’s lean thinking that turns them into realities
How does the tech sector apply lean thinking?
What lessons can manufacturers learn from the tech sector’s application of lean innovation?
Successfully applying lean innovation requires having a willingness to change
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Brian Lagas
© 2023 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.