Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Daniel Croft
Noncontact scanning for safer, faster, more accurate, and cost-effective inspections
National Physical Laboratory
Using Raman spectroscopy for graphene and related 2D materials
Ashley Hixson
Partnership with Hexagon’s Manufacturing Intelligence division provides employable metrology skills
Annual meeting in Phoenix, April 26–28
Krysten Crawford
Stanford researchers designed a program to accelerate hiring for minorities and women

More Features

Innovation News
New features revolutionize metrology and inspection processes with nondimensional AI inspection
Strategic partnership expands industrial machining and repair capabilities
Supports robots from 14 leading manufacturers
AI designed to improve productivity and processes
Ultrasonic flaw detector now has B/C scan capability, improved connectivity, and an app to aid inspection
Tapping tooz for AR/VR competence center
Provides opportunities to deepen leadership capabilities
ASI Construction partners with end users to deliver solutions to production operations

More News


Let’s Keep Meetings Virtual After Covid

Virtual meetings are cheaper, more accessible, and better for the planet

Published: Thursday, July 15, 2021 - 12:02

This story was originally published by Knowable Magazine.

In 2020, the annual committee meeting of the journal we edit was a bit of a mess. It took place in March, just days before the World Health Organization declared Covid-19 a pandemic, so some attendees canceled their travel even as others were arriving at the meeting site.

At the last minute, we pivoted to a hybrid meeting, with half the attendees in-person and the other half virtual. Although the meeting was successful in terms of editorial decisions, the mixed format hampered our normally free-flowing discussions.

The 2021 meeting of the journal, the Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, was entirely virtual. And it went much more smoothly.

By then, we all had a year’s experience working in an online environment. Everyone was remote, which made the means of communication equitable, and we made sure each member had a chance to participate. We included breaks to reduce video fatigue, and breakout rooms for parallel small-group discussions that helped increase efficiency. We developed a more scripted schedule that we followed closely to ensure that everyone knew what to expect.

In many professions, business travel is part of the job. This is particularly true in science, where international collaborations are the norm. But as we look ahead to a post-Covid world, we’re not sure that we want to go back to spending so much of our professional lives in planes, hotels, restaurants, and rental cars. There are obvious benefits to in-person meet-ups, but they don’t always outweigh the costs: time, money, and the effects of travel on the climate. More professions—especially within science—should explicitly consider those costs, and the benefits of virtual meetings.

conference attendees looking at their phones

We’re not the only ones who don’t want a return to “normal”: More than 400 scientists have signed a letter urging U.S. scientific organizations to explore more remote meetings in the future. A recent poll of more than 900 readers of the journal Nature found that nearly three-quarters want scientific meetings to be all virtual, or at least to have a remote option, even after Covid is over.

There are obvious benefits to in-person meet-ups, but they don’t always outweigh the costs: time, money and the effects of travel on the climate.

The benefits are obvious. A 2019 analysis from Runzheimer—part of the tech company Motus, which sells products for mobile workers—found that every business trip costs $1,300 per traveler. To U.S. companies, that translated to roughly $112 billion in expenses in 2019 alone. Those costs render in-person meetings off-limits to many companies and individuals, effectively widening existing gaps.

Even if people can afford to buy a plane ticket, they may have other limitations that make the trip impossible, such as illness or challenges with securing childcare. Some online accessibility features, such as real-time captioning, are not always available at in-person meetings. Virtual meetings can eliminate some of those barriers, and they may be more accessible: When the European Geosciences Union made its 2020 meeting virtual, attendance rose from a typical 16,000 to 26,000.

Travel also has an enormous impact on climate. In one estimate published in Nature, air travel to a single scientific meeting—the fall meeting of the American Geophysical Union, attended by 28,000 people from around the world—generated the equivalent of 80,000 tons of carbon dioxide, the average amount emitted by the entire city of Edinburgh over the course of a week.

We can’t just flip a switch to virtual meetings without working out some kinks. Our 2021 virtual editorial committee meeting started at 8 a.m. California time, which was midnight for a colleague in Japan—who then had to stay awake for a further eight hours. It will be near impossible to pick a time that is convenient for everyone around the world, but we need to make sure that benefits outweigh inconveniences for each participant.

Virtual meetings also must provide ways for people to interact socially, particularly newcomers. Dinners and receptions at in-person events can help attendees new to the scene get to know other board members and make invaluable work connections, but these are difficult to replicate over a screen. Work discussions (let alone socializing) can be particularly tricky during hybrid meetings, so ways must be found to ensure that remote participants—including those from underrepresented communities—can network as fully and freely as people who are able to attend in person. Small group meetings ahead of time can ensure that each individual’s insights are clearly heard, and breakout rooms designated for specific topics can help to constructively focus discussions.

Of course, virtual or hybrid meetings can’t replicate everything about the in-person experience. Attendees may lose the opportunities for exquisite restaurant meals with colleagues, or the excuse for a family trip. And there are intangible benefits to gathering experts in a room to mutually educate each other, where you can easily interject or pull someone aside.

But given the potential benefits of virtual meetings to improve access, cut expenses, and help the planet, we want to see more of them in the future. Let’s not go back to the way things were before.

A version of this article first appeared on Insider.

This article is part of Reset: The Science of Crisis & Recovery, an ongoing series exploring how the world is navigating the coronavirus pandemic, its consequences, and the way forward. Reset is supported by a grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

This article originally appeared June 15, 2021, in Knowable Magazine, an independent journalistic endeavor from Annual Reviews. Sign up for the newsletter.


About The Authors

Katherine H. Freeman’s picture

Katherine H. Freeman

Katherine H. Freeman is an Evan Pugh University Professor and geochemist at The Pennsylvania State University. She directs the lab at the Freeman Research Group, teaches, and mentors students.  Her research interests include isotopic biogeochemistry, paleoclimate, and new methods in organic isotope analyses. 

Raymond Jeanloz’s picture

Raymond Jeanloz

Raymond Jeanloz, a geophysicist, is a professor of earth and planetary science and of astronomy at the University of California, Berkeley. Jeanloz and his group study the nature and evolution of planetary interiors, as well as the properties of materials at high pressures. 

Knowable Magazine’s picture

Knowable Magazine

Knowable Magazine is an independent journalistic endeavor from Annual Reviews, a nonprofit publisher dedicated to synthesizing and integrating knowledge for the progress of science and the benefit of society. Sign up for Knowable Magazine’s newsletter.