Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Anton Ovchinnikov
In competitive environments, operational innovation could well be the answer to inventory risk
Brian A. Weiss
Tech transfer can be more efficient
Zach Winn
Optical milk scanner uses materials-sensing technology to measure the health of cows
Tamara Sheldon
EV subsidies are poorly designed, but simple changes could make them more effective and equitable
Rebecca Beyer
Knowing who creates a robot makes it feel more authentic

More Features

Innovation News
MIT course focuses on the impact of increased longevity on systems and markets
Upgraded with blue laser technology
The Ring Dex 2 filling and capping system is designed to simplify production.
The QM certification is awarded for excellence in curriculum design and quality
Recent research finds organizations unprepared to manage more complex workforce
For scenarios that require a rapid response
With block-based editor, anyone can realize projects using AI-based image processing
Product placement lends depth to sustainability
Industrial Scan&Sand solution wins RBR50 Innovation Award

More News

Brandon Cornuke


Innovate Your Way to Growth While Minimizing Risks

Focusing on cost isn’t sustainable for growth

Published: Thursday, May 26, 2022 - 12:03

Manufacturers work hard to minimize disruptions to their operations and invest significant resources to minimize production risk. They also are under constant pressure to find new ways to deliver more value to their customers. Sustainable business growth is critical to delivering this value. Many achieve that sustainability through experimentation.

But innovation and experimentation involve risk, which could lead to wasted resources, not meeting expectations, or a lack of return on investment. Sometimes precious resources will be devoted to experiments that will not work out. But just as there is the risk of failure, there is risk associated with not being innovative as well. For instance, the business may not stay competitive.

Manufacturers can reduce their innovation risk by linking initiatives to the unmet needs of their customers. They need to anticipate how their customers’ needs will change in the future.

Focusing on cost isn’t sustainable for growth

The notion that “cheaper is where innovation goes to die” has never been more evident than during the recent disruptions in the global supply chain. The traditional focus on low, per-unit cost of production has proven to be shortsighted as the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic led to factory shutdowns in Asia and a cascading series of issues that still haunt U.S. manufacturers, such as failed deliveries, unreliable schedules, and massive increases in shipping costs.

A smaller manufacturer can’t focus on cost alone in the supply chain. It must value reliability and however it and its partners can add value. A manufacturer can mitigate risk with a disciplined approach to its supply chain, by maintaining redundant sourcing and finding new suppliers. Many small manufacturers are now realizing the benefits of doing things differently, which can increase efficiencies, growth, and competitive advantage. This applies to new product development (NPD) as well. Manufacturers can mitigate risk in innovation with a disciplined approach to NPD.

A disciplined approach will help manage risk in innovation

Manufacturers can better manage innovation risk if their organizations are aligned behind an initiative. This starts with leadership’s desire to dedicate resources to the initiative, and depends on good timing to take advantage of opportunities and the market.

In many ways, barriers to innovation have been lowered. Analytical tools and predictive modeling capabilities enable manufacturers to extract more meaning and direction from their data. Cloud computing enables manufacturers to benefit from robust IT capabilities without having to maintain related software, hardware, and infrastructure in-house. There are also potential partnerships available with lab scientists, engineers, and cutting-edge technology to solve vexing problems and test concepts for manufacturers. Often, connectors in various markets can help find the right resources for specific challenges.

Being customer-centric is a huge advantage in NPD. If a manufacturer knows what its customers’ pain points are, and it knows what they will be worried about in the near future, it is in a better position to bring them additional value.

It’s essential to follow an iterative process for NPD that involves design, prototyping, and testing, and then keeping what works and refining the rest. At every iteration, a manufacturer must ask:
• Is this solving an important problem?
• Does this work actually solve the problem?
• Does the business have the resources to produce and deliver this in its current iteration?
• Will anybody buy it (and at what cost)?

The phases of new product development

McKinsey & Company popularized a model of growth with three distinct phases of NPD, which it refers to as “horizons.” Each horizon requires a focus on product, process, distribution, and customers. The three horizons are:

Close-in: About 70 percent of NPD falls into this category. This horizon is about taking products or services the manufacturer already has and improving them and the margins. For many small manufacturers, this entails making a machine or process more efficient to lower costs. It might also be centered on improving quality. Ultimately, this is work to improve upon the core business.

Midway: This covers about 20 percent of NPD. Examples of this could be growth by expanding into a new market or region, or launching a new product. This involves some type of investment and, thereby, risk. It amounts to extending beyond the old dimensions of a business model to nurture an emerging business.

Disruptive: This represents about 10 percent of NPD. Creating a genuinely new business and new business model requires a significant investment and a higher level of risk. Failure is often associated with high levels of risk, and these types of NPD are no different. Disruptive ideas may be unproven and potentially unprofitable for some time.

When this model first emerged, the three horizons were more easily associated with time frames—close-in meant something that could be completed more quickly than midway. But that isn’t necessarily the case anymore. As mentioned, digitalization has lowered many barriers. Manufacturers would be wise to focus on speed of delivery across all three horizons.

MEP centers can help manage risk in new product development

Innovation comes with risk, but the benefits of being innovative can be significant. Manufacturers that build NPD into their culture often develop “intrapreneurs,” staff members with an entrepreneurial spirit who will help their companies grow.

Not sure where to start? The Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) National Network can help manufacturers achieve growth through innovation and new product development. Contact a local MEP Center to get the conversation started.

First published April 14, 2022, in NIST’s Manufacturing Innovation Blog.


About The Author

Brandon Cornuke’s picture

Brandon Cornuke

Brandon Cornuke is vice president of strategy and vice president of startup services for MAGNET, which is part of the Ohio MEP and the MEP National Network. He is responsible for the Startup Services division—known as the Iterator—and leads the efforts to help innovators turn manufactured product ideas into growing businesses. He specializes in strategy development, business model design, and lean innovation.