Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
David L. Chandler
Greater sensitivity and speed for industrial inspection, airport security, and communications
Anton Ovchinnikov
The push-pull effects of customization
Robert Zaruda
Connecting education and industry to create careers
Christopher Dancy
Not binding, not enforceable, but a step in the right direction
Scott Ginsberg
A balancing act between getting new technology and bringing it to your people

More Features

Innovation News
High-performance polymers for use in high-temperature range developed for 2PP 3D printing
Technique may enable energy-efficient 3D printing of blades for gas turbines or jet engines
Easily synthesized chemical filter could stop greenhouse gas from reaching atmosphere
New medical product from Canon’s Video Sensing Division
Features include flexible installation and fast measurement
Guidance for deploying digital twins safely and securely
Electric power is replacing diesel and hydraulics in construction industry

More News

Jennifer Lauren Lee

Innovation

Back to the Future: Gear Edition

After 30 years NIST is once again calibrating gear artifacts, which could improve electric cars

Published: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 - 11:03

As mechanical objects, gears have been around for so long that people generally take them for granted. But gears are sophisticated parts that play a vital role in cars, airplanes, construction and mining equipment, food processing, clock making, and more. Companies are still trying to make them better—specifically, quieter.

As electric vehicles become more popular, the auto industry is pushing for gears that have tighter and tighter tolerances—in other words, smaller differences between the maximum and minimum sizes in a batch of gears that are considered acceptable for sale. Gears that fit together better make less noise, transfer power more efficiently, and last longer.


The smaller of the two gear artifacts calibrated at NIST this summer. Credit: NIST

“Those gear noises have always been there in gas cars, but electric cars are so quiet that now you can hear them over the engine,” says Dennis Everett, a mechanical engineer at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). “Consumers don’t like hearing those noises.”


Closeup of the larger of the two gear artifacts calibrated at NIST this summer. The CMM’s ruby-tipped probe touches the artifact’s involute curve. Credit: NIST


In addition to the gear artifact measured in 2019, NIST provided calibrations for two gear artifacts this summer: a larger one (background) whose involute feature has a relatively shallow curve, and a smaller one (foreground) with a much steeper curve.
Credit: NIST

Now, after a more than 30-year break, NIST is once again conducting ultra-accurate gear-related measurements for customers, starting with a major U.S. company that supports gear manufacturing.

As the nation’s laboratory for metrology, NIST was performing these services for decades when requested by customers. During the 1980s, however, aging infrastructure made it impossible to maintain the necessary accuracy. A few years later, another government lab, Y-12, run by the U.S. Department of Energy, started to offer this service, with measurements traceable to NIST.

But then, a few years ago, Y-12 could no longer make these measurements with the necessary level of precision. The gear metrology industry found itself in a situation where if NIST couldn’t do the measurements, it would have had to go overseas to another government’s national metrology institute, which would have been expensive and time-consuming.

“It’s important that NIST maintain itself as a resource to be used by American gear manufacturers,” says Mark Cowan, senior systems engineer for Gleason Corp., the U.S. company that commissioned the NIST calibrations. “There’s also an advantage to saying the measurements are NIST-traceable,” Cowan continues. “Companies like to hear something is NIST-traceable.”

So, in 2019, Everett was tasked with rebuilding the old calibration capabilities. After a trial measurement of one specialized part, he and NIST’s Dan Sawyer finished measuring two more for Gleason with higher accuracies than before.

Among its other products, Gleason makes and uses a part called a gear artifact. Gear artifacts are metal objects of different sizes and shapes with dimensions that are known with high accuracy. The gear artifact is not itself a gear, but it has pieces that have the shape and size of a single gear tooth. These artifacts are used to calibrate equipment that measures gears and are necessary for precision manufacturing and quality control.

Gear artifacts themselves need to be calibrated to be useful. However, their calibration is a highly specialized task.

Gear teeth usually have a shape that follows what’s called an involute curve, which allows gears of different diameters to mesh together smoothly (see animations).

Involute wheel
Gear teeth (and gear artifacts) usually have a shape that follows the path of an involute curve. The involute shape ensures the gear teeth mesh smoothly together. Credit: Wikipedia



Involute of circle
The radius of a circle is the same at every point along its diameter. But the radius of an involute curve increases as you trace outward from the center point. Credit: Wikipedia

Gear artifacts also frequently feature an involute curve. This is a relatively complex shape compared to, say, a sphere or a block. It takes a lot of expertise and training, and precision measurement equipment, to make measurements of the involute curves on gear artifacts with sufficiently low uncertainties.

Everett had originally been involved with this kind of calibration during the 1990s, when he was a “rookie metrologist.” Since then, he has become an expert in making difficult artifact measurements, such as those for thread gauges, which are relied on for everything from the nuts and bolts you might buy at a hardware store to the threaded connections used in oil and gas drilling operations.

The machine NIST used to calibrate a gear artifact is called a coordinate measuring machine (CMM), which uses a touch probe to detect, and specialized software to determine, the distances between points on an object in three dimensions

To set up the 2019 measurements, Everett was able to use a high-accuracy CMM that NIST had purchased in the 1990s for a series of comparison measurements of gear artifacts between NIST and other institutions. However, the machine had since received a software update and new hardware, including a touch probe and a system for controlling the probe’s movement. So, although Everett started by looking through his notes from 25 years ago, he also had to spend time assessing the improved CMM’s performance.

With the CMM’s heightened capabilities came unknowns about how the system performed, and Everett couldn’t learn what else had changed without extensive testing. In addition, the gear artifact he was measuring was more complicated than the ones he had calibrated during the 1990s.


NIST’s Dennis Everett, with the larger gear artifact sitting on the CMM used to make the measurements. (Credit: NIST)

“It was probably a total of five months of me re-creating what was done in the past and then applying it to a unique artifact we hadn’t seen before,” Everett says. “Then we were going back and forth with the customer to make sure we’re delivering what they want and expect, and that we’re doing it correctly.”

For the 2019 measurements it performed for Gleason, NIST was able to offer the customer 1.5-micrometer (µm, millionth of a meter) uncertainties. For the new calibrations of two new Gleason artifacts completed this month, Everett was able to push that down to between 0.6 and 1.0 µm, depending on the parameter.

One way Everett improved the measurements this time around was to use a technique called “measurement decomposition,” which involves introducing a series of simpler artifacts maintained by NIST to the calibration. By comparing those simpler objects to the sections of the gear artifact that they most resemble, the NIST researchers lowered the uncertainties further than would have been possible if they had measured the artifact alone.

Now that NIST has regained (and improved upon) its former capability, it’s possible the institute will get more requests for this special type of calibration.

“I believe there are some military facilities that, if they knew NIST could calibrate their gear artifacts, they would send their artifacts to them,” Cowan says.

Everett agrees.“I wouldn’t be surprised if we get more inquiries once word gets out that we can do it,” he says.

First published Sept. 12, 2022, by NIST

Discuss

About The Author

Jennifer Lauren Lee’s picture

Jennifer Lauren Lee

Jennifer Lauren Lee is a science communicator in the Washington, D.C. area with specialization in physics writing, web design, editing, and multimedia. She is a technical writer and editor at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), where she writes monthly articles on physics topics for NIST’s Physical Measurement Laboratory (PML) as well as records and edits videos demonstrating physics concepts and experimental setups used at PML to maintain and distribute national standards. Lee has master’s degrees in specialized journalism and science, and bachelor’s degrees in English and world literature.