Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Andrew Maynard
Who gets to imagine the future and be a part of building it?
Lauren Dunford
Four steps for any factory to unlock big wins with digital tools
Taran March @ Quality Digest
Designing good habits into laboratory work tools
Joe Chew
New system holds the key to unprecedented accuracy in beam control
Sana Kazilbash
Using tools like Autodesk Fusion 360, the CNC Enhanced course is facilitating inclusion in manufacturing

More Features

Innovation News
The tabletop diagnostic yields results in an hour and can be programmed to detect variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus
First Responder UAS Triple Challenge focuses on using optical sensors and data analysis to improve image detection and location
More than half of respondents expect to meet Industry 4.0 goals within two years
Both quality professionals and their business leaders agree that openness and communication is essential to moving forward
Voxel8 patented technology will provide printed lattice structures to be used as inserts in midsoles
Purpose-built for cannabis analysis
True 3D holographic displays are practical with only moderate computational requirements
Inspect nozzle welds using phased array ultrasound testing techniques including ray-tracing, scanner simulation, coverage maps
Produce large parts up to 300 × 300 × 450 mm without residual stress, gas cross flow, or having to pre-sinter powder bed

More News

Mark Esser

Innovation

From 1901 to 2021: Measurements Then and Now

Much of its early work is baked into the U.S. economy, but NIST continues advancing measurement science

Published: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 - 12:01

Alot has changed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) during the past 120 years. For one thing, we were known as the National Bureau of Standards for the first 87 years of our existence. Then, in 1988, we became the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), to reflect our agency’s expanding mission and a renewed emphasis on boosting the competitiveness of American industry.

But as much as things change, they also stay the same. While much of our early work has been baked into the American economy, NIST continues to be a world leader in advancing measurement science. We still provide many of our original services, though the techniques and technologies have evolved.


A Riefler clock. Click for larger image. Credit: NIST

Time

NIST didn’t build its own clock at the very beginning. One of the first purchases NIST made was a Riefler clock in 1904 from the Clemens Riefler firm in Germany. The Riefler clock was a highly stable pendulum clock that achieved accuracies to within one-hundredth of a second per day, about 3.5 seconds per year.

Today, using technology made possible by the Nobel Prize-winning work of NIST’s Bill Phillips and his colleagues, we use atomic fountain clocks to define the second as the time it takes for 9,192,631,770 cycles of radiation to be emitted from a specially energized cesium atom. The most advanced cesium clock, the NIST-F2, is so accurate that it would neither gain nor lose one second in about 300 million years.


NIST physicists Steve Jefferts (foreground) and Tom Heavner with the NIST-F2 cesium fountain atomic clock. Credit: NIST

Electricity

The ampere that our founders were using in 1901 was not the same unit of electric current that we use today. In fact, it wasn’t even quite one ampere. Back then, the ampere was practically defined as the current that would electrically deposit a small amount of silver on a negatively charged surface using a device known as a silver voltmeter. That voltmeter in turn had to be calibrated using a standard Weston cell, a type of battery that reliably produced a steady voltage for a reasonably long time.


Scientist F.A. Wolff (right) operates an oil bath while watching a temperature gauge in order to measure the temperature response of several Weston cells, used to calibrate voltmeters in 1903. His colleague on the left appears to be crafting the mercury thermometers used in the experiment. Click for larger image. Credit: NIST


Josephson junction chip for 10-volt programmable standards. Click for larger image. Credit: Dresselhaus/NIST

Now, the workhorse of precise and accurate primary realizations of the volt the world over is the Josephson junction, only made possible by quantum phenomena that were discovered decades after NIST was founded. A Josephson junction is made from two layers of superconducting materials separated by a layer of atomically thin insulating material. When the junction is bathed in a particular frequency of microwave radiation, a quantum mechanical phenomenon known as electron tunneling causes it to generate a proportional voltage. NIST now makes Josephson junctions that offer accuracies of better than one part per billion and don’t ever need to be calibrated. The standards are used to calibrate voltmeters—devices important to the manufacture of consumer and industrial electronics and even the operation of the electric grid.

Standard reference materials

NIST has been producing standard reference materials (SRMs) since 1905. First, we produced standard samples of iron for the American Foundrymen’s Association to aid in metallurgical analysis and quality control. Before long, NIST was making “standard samples” (our original name for SRMs) for hundreds of products and materials. Now, NIST produces more than 1,000 different types of SRMs, each of which has thoroughly measured properties.


Early reference materials. Click for larger image. Credit: NIST


NIST’s monoclonal antibody reference material, NIST RM 8671. Credit: Matthew DeLorme/Matthew DeLorme Photography

Today, we have SRMs for things that people 120 years ago might not have imagined. For instance, our monoclonal antibody reference material. Many of today’s top drugs are based on monoclonal antibodies, customizable proteins that can block pathways for disease and seek out specific cells, such as cancer cells, and deliver chemicals or radiation to them. NIST’s reference material provides a common benchmark that drugmakers can share to verify and improve their methods for quality control.

Mass

When NIST was founded, we had our own precision balances constructed for comparing and calibrating masses against the U.S. copies of the International Prototype Kilogram, a small cylinder of platinum and iridium that served as the world’s standard of mass. Those balances would have looked a lot like this Rueprecht balance, which was built in 1901 and bought by NIST in 1945. It was used for primary mass comparisons until 1960, when it was replaced by a NIST-improved version.


Rueprecht balance. Click for larger image. Credit: NIST Digital Archives

Now, the ultimate standard of mass is no longer a physical object. It’s defined in terms of an unchanging number in quantum physics called the Planck constant, which, through a couple of mathematical steps, can convert a certain amount of the energy in electromagnetic radiation to its equivalent in mass. In the laboratory, the kilogram is measured by the electrical energy it takes to hold that mass against the force of Earth’s gravity. We measure that electrical energy using a new kind of balance called a Kibble balance, a technology that NIST and its colleagues at the National Physical Laboratory in the United Kingdom improved and refined for use to redefine the kilogram.


The NIST-4 Kibble balance. Click for larger image. Credit: J. Lee/NIST

Lighting

Shortly after its founding, NIST was put to work testing some of the products the government bought to see if they were up to specifications. One problem that plagued the government was how quickly the light bulbs it bought were burning out. At that time, the government was buying one million incandescent light bulbs per year. NIST tested a selection of commercially available bulbs, and its work showed that many bulbs didn’t conform to the manufacturer’s standards or federal specifications. Because the government bought so many products, testing helped improve the quality of not just light bulbs, but countless products from entire industries that wanted to sell to the government.


Early NIST light bulb test bed. Click for larger image. Credit: NIST

NIST is still gathering test data on lighting products. One of the major differences is that it’s no longer incandescent light bulbs, but LEDs. We’ve all heard that LEDs are supposed to be able to burn for 50,000 hours or more, but how do we know that? Industry tests don’t often simulate the way LEDs are used in real life, so NIST set up a test bed for LEDs to gather data to help improve models of their performance, leading to better products in the real world.


Yuqin Zong works on the test chamber within which 480 LEDs are attached to the top of the sphere’s interior. The monitor at left shows the image of the test units from a digital camera mounted at the bottom of the sphere. Click for larger image. Credit: NIST

Looking ahead

NIST’s impact on the past 120 years has been considerable. Now a major thrust of NIST’s work is to move NIST measurements out of our labs and put them directly in the hands of industrial and scientific researchers in the form of chip-based standards for not only voltage and electric current, but also time and temperature and a host of other quantities. The NIST on a Chip program promises to revolutionize the way standard measurements are made. Who knows? Perhaps this could be another turning point in NIST’s history?

First published March 3, 2021, on NIST’s Taking Measure blog.

Discuss

About The Author

Mark Esser’s picture

Mark Esser

Mark Esser is a writer in the NIST public affairs office and a contributing editor to the NIST Taking Measure blog. Esser also manages NIST’s social media accounts, leads tours, and voices the Mole and Major Uncertainty for the League of SI Superheroes. Esser prefers crunchy peanut butter.