Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Ryan E. Day
Stanley Black & Decker partners with Techstars to help startups bring on advanced manufacturing
Knowledge at Wharton
Technology companies aren’t equipped to dislodge traditional automakers from the driver’s seat and must learn to share the controls
Austin Choi-Fitzpatrick
From Standing Rock to Syria, drones are holding the powerful to account. Let’s keep it that way.
Innovating Service With Chip Bell
Is there a method you’ve missed?
Judah Levine
How the UTC time scale was defined

More Features

Innovation News
True 3D holographic displays are practical with only moderate computational requirements
Inspect nozzle welds using phased array ultrasound testing techniques including ray-tracing, scanner simulation, coverage maps
Produce large parts up to 300 × 300 × 450 mm without residual stress, gas cross flow, or having to pre-sinter powder bed
Interfacial launches highly filled, proprietary polymer masterbatches
‘Completely new diagnostic platform’ could prove to be a valuable clinical tool for detecting exposure to multiple viruses
Precitech ships Nanoform X diamond turning lathe to Keene State College
Galileo’s Telescope describes how to measure success at the top of the organization, translate down to every level of supervision

More News

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Innovation

Researchers Outline Physics of Metal 3D Printing

Getting to ‘just press print’

Published: Thursday, February 4, 2016 - 16:14

Although the most common method of metal 3D printing is growing exponentially, moving forward from producing prototypes to manufacturing critical parts will be possible only by reaching a fundamental understanding of the complex physics behind the process, according to a new paper written by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) researchers.

The powder bed fusion process, also known as selective laser melting (SLM), requires thin layers of a metal powder to be spread across a build area, where they are fused by a laser or electron beam based on a 3D computer-aided design (CAD) model. The process is repeated until a part is produced, layer by layer, from the bottom up.

Even though the method has quickly progressed into a production technology, 3D printing of metal parts (also known as metal additive manufacturing) for industries such as aerospace and healthcare is hampered, according to LLNL’s Wayne King, by a lack of confidence in the finished parts. According to King, this hurdle can be overcome by a combination of physics-based modeling and high-performance computing to determine the optimal parameters for building each part.

“If we want to put parts into critical applications, they have to meet quality criteria,” says King, leader of the lab’s Accelerated Certification of Additively Manufactured Metals Project (ACAMM). “Our project is focused on developing a science-based understanding of the additive manufacturing process to build confidence in the quality of parts. We want to accelerate certification and qualification to take advantage of the flexibility that metal additive manufacturing gives us. Ideally, our plants would like to build a part on Monday that can be qualified, and on Tuesday use the same machine to build a different part that can also be qualified.”


From left: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researchers—Ibo Matthews, a principal investigator leading the lab’s effort on the joint open source software project; Wayne King, director of the Accelerated Certification of Additively Manufactured Metals Initiative; and Gabe Guss, engineering associate—examine a 3D-printed part manufactured using the selective laser melting process.

In a paper published in the January edition of Applied Physics Reviews that was commissioned by the publication, King and his team describe two physics-based models for the selective laser melting process on scales varying from the particulate powder to the whole part or component.

The team’s comprehensive powder model addresses the formation, evolution, and solidification of the melt pool, and could be used to better understand how laser power, speed, beam size, and shape affect different types of metals and develop parameters for new materials, the researchers said. It also could provide insights into the dominant physical processes in the laser-powder interaction and guide improvements to the SLM method in the future, according to Andy Anderson, a co-author of the paper.

The part-scale model simulates the 3D printing of full-scale parts, calculating the effects of stress and heat arising from a given type of metal, and laser process parameters. It could improve predictions of deformation and stresses during printing that can lead to part failure, as well as help improve quality, eliminating much of the guesswork involved in creating new parts.

“By modeling the fabrication, you can see what is the aggregate behavior of the part and essentially build in compensations,” says Bob Ferencz, LLNL’s division leader for computational engineering, and a co-author of the paper. “If there is warping, we can warp the target geometry to arrive at the correct net shape. The benefit of simulations is that you can slow down the process, and hopefully that informs you as to mitigations for the mechanisms you see as the cause of the failure.”

Combining the physics models with data-mining technologies and uncertainty analyses could optimize metal parts without the cost of multiple experiments, and aid in more widespread adoption of metal 3D printing, the researchers said.

“These models will be a big step forward toward getting away from the experience base and getting the science base behind it,” says King. “We’re talking about getting to the place of saying ‘just press print’ for metal. It could broadly impact the way people apply metal additive manufacturing.”

Other LLNL scientists and researchers contributing to the three-year study include Neil Hodge, Chandrika Kamath, Saad Khairallah, and Alexander Rubenchik.

The Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program at LLNL funded the team’s work.

Discuss

About The Author

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s picture

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s (LLNL) focus remains as clear as it was when it opened its doors in 1952: ensuring the nation’s security through scientific research and engineering development, responding to new threats in an ever-changing world, and developing new technologies that will benefit people everywhere. At LLNL, physicists, chemists, biologists, engineers, computer scientists, and other researchers work together in multidisciplinary teams to achieve technical innovations and scientific breakthroughs that make possible solutions to critical problems of national and global importance.

Comments

AM Barriers

Understanding the physics in greater detail will pbe a great step forward. Unfortunately, until methods are developed and proven to be able to verify the integrity of the part produced, neither the medical nor aerospace arenas will accept parts for any critical function. Perhaps understanding the physics will provide a springboard toward that goal.