Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Health Care Features
Dario Lirio
Modernization is critical to enhance patient experience and boost clinical trial productivity
Alexander Khomich
Healthcare software opens up opportunities for clinics in both management and patient care
Gary Shorter
Pharma needs to adapt and evolve with the changing environment of life science data
Can using RNA like a circuit breaker make it a computer?
Knowledge at Wharton
Deploying technology in operational decision-making can improve conditions for workers and outcomes for patients

More Features

Health Care News
Winter 2022 release of Reliance QMS focuses on usability, mobility, and actionable insights
The tabletop diagnostic yields results in an hour and can be programmed to detect variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus
First Responder UAS Triple Challenge focuses on using optical sensors and data analysis to improve image detection and location
Free education source for global medical device community
Extended validation of Thermo Scientific Salmonella Precis Method simplifies workflows and encompasses challenging food matrices
‘Completely new diagnostic platform’ could prove to be a valuable clinical tool for detecting exposure to multiple viruses
Provides improved thermal stability for stored materials, risk mitigation advantages, and processes that are documented and repeatable
Patient safety is a key focus in update of ISO 14155, the industry reference for good practice in clinical trials.
Despite being far from campus because of the pandemic, some students are engineering a creative way to stay connected

More News

Sally Davies

Health Care

White Coats and Mild Manners

How to style a good doctor

Published: Thursday, August 16, 2018 - 12:01

It’s hard to believe that modern Western doctors, with their multimillion-dollar hospitals and high-tech gadgets, have much in common with their ancient counterparts. Up to the 19th century, doctors usually occupied a fairly low status in society. Doctors these days generally enjoy better working conditions, but the basic rules guiding their style, dress, and decorum have remained surprisingly static for the past 2,500 years.

Physicians’ appearance has been the most closely monitored of any professional class in history, aside from the police and the military. (It’s probably not a coincidence that all three deal with life and death.) In ancient Greece, medical encounters took place in public; even in the home, there were usually onlookers. Hospitals as we know them didn’t exist until the first Muslim-built bimaristan in Baghdad during the 9th century CE. Because there were so often spectators, some flourish was expected. Apparently, Greek doctors in ancient times really got into character, necessitating one author to warn against “luxurious headgear and elaborate perfumes in order to gain patients... for excess of strangeness will win you ill-repute, but a little will be considered good taste.”

We still expect our doctors to appear neat, without much adornment. I’d be taken aback to see my primary-care doctor wearing large diamonds or a Hermès scarf. While they can still exhibit some personal “flair,” it’s generally limited. Such strictures begin with the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates or, more precisely, “the Hippocratics.” Historians generally agree that multiple people were involved in writing the 60 or so medical texts that offer some of the first instructions in history about how to be a good doctor. The Hippocratic corpus is the birthplace of medical ethics, the source of an oath that all doctors still take at the end of their training.

In the Hippocratic text titled Decorum, doctors are instructed to “dress decorous and simple, not over-elaborated, but aiming rather at good repute, and adapted for contemplation, introspection, and walking.” A Hippocratic author writing on surgery instructed doctors on the minutiae of their posture and the position of their limbs during procedures, and maintained that “dress should be well drawn together, without creases, everything even, and corresponding on elbows and shoulders.”

Today, Stanford Medical School’s code of conduct still demands that medical students “dress professionally and conservatively,” with their white coat “clean, pressed, and worn at all times.” The University of Utah’s medical school dictates details right down to the appropriate fabric for slacks or trousers, which must be “made of firmer fabric to maintain professional appearance.”

But is your doctor’s clothing, perfume, or jewelry really worthy of so much attention? Research suggests that the seeming superfluities of style are much more important in medicine than you might think. In a study of 337 intensive-care patients from 2013, researchers found that the subjects and their families saw physicians in white coats as more knowledgeable, truthful, and competent than those who were dressed more casually, in “bare-below-the-elbows” attire. In another study, patients were informed of the (true) fact that a physician’s white coat can transmit disease, but they still preferred it to sneakers and jeans.

During the 1970s, social scientists began to suggest that social interactions could be seen as “performances.” Perhaps this is really the best way to view a trip to the doctor. There’s a typical setting, at least two roles to play, and an appropriate costume for each character. At its most streamlined, seeing a physician has a standard script: the recitation of symptoms by the patient; the physician’s interrogation, ritual tests, and pokes; the proclamation as to what has gone wrong; advice (or prescriptions) for the malady; and an act that marks the end of the engagement. 

One thing that distinguishes the doctor from the patient in this encounter is appearance. The neatness, professionalism, and vitality of the former is contrasted with the weakened, supplicant state of the latter. In contemporary medicine, the patient is often demarcated by the ceremonial and rather humiliating paper robe, while the doctor is well-dressed and groomed, often finished off with a modern white lab coat.

The coat is a fairly recent development, replacing the somber black dress that doctors typically wore prior to the late 19th century. After that, physicians began to present themselves in white, copying the garb of lab workers in order to lend the profession credibility. But while the white coat serves to establish medical authority, it sometimes does this too well. People have been known to suffer from “white coat syndrome,” in which their blood pressure rises, and they become anxious the moment the doctor walks in the room (of course, some suffer from the syndrome in the presence of any medical staff, regardless of garb, but it’s not as common when patients are treated by nurses).

“Bedside manner” is another quality we’ve long expected from our physicians. In Decorum, the author warns that “dourness is repulsive both to the healthy and to the sick,” and suggests that physicians should “be calm and assured of what [they] are saying,” and “bear in mind [their] manner of sitting, reserve, arrangement of dress, decisive utterance, brevity of speech, composure.” The Hippocratic doctor was instructed to be a mild-mannered, sure-minded, sober man, not easy to excite or anger, and kind to patients and families without being given to “excessive gaiety” or laughing.

By now, there’s a growing body of evidence that a patient’s perception of a doctor’s character influences health outcomes. Patients are more likely to be honest and satisfied with physicians when they’re viewed as compassionate, not just capable and competent. Displays of empathy have been shown to improve outcomes in people struggling with conditions including obesity, diabetes, hypertension, asthma, pulmonary infections, and osteoarthritis.

A doctor’s presentation, then, is part of what establishes trust and authority in the doctor-patient relationship. Yet the rise of patient-centred medicine, and modern patients’ ability to arm themselves with medical knowledge, is changing this dynamic—pushing the patient to become more of a consumer or customer than a supplicant. Doctors in the 21st century need to retain their professional standing but shed any remaining projections of superiority. For the first time since the 5th century BCE, the dialogue of the medical script could soon contain an equal number of lines for each character.

First published on Aeon.


About The Author

Sally Davies’s picture

Sally Davies

Sally Davies is the senior editor at Aeon magazine.