PROMISE: Our kitties will never sit on top of content. Please turn off your ad blocker for our site.
puuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrr
Thomas Abrams
Published: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 - 10:38 You probably have seen many consumer advertisements for prescriptions drugs—on TV, in magazines, or online. Although those ads are expensive, did you know that in 2010, pharmaceutical companies actually spent more money advertising to healthcare professionals than they spent advertising to consumers?
Here at the FDA, our Office of Prescription Drug Promotion monitors the information that pharmaceutical companies give to healthcare professionals about prescription drugs. We want to make sure the information your doctor or prescriber receives is truthful and not misleading because they may use it when deciding what medicines to prescribe to you, their patient. We have just launched via our learning portal, Medscape, an e-learning course and case studies as part of our Bad Ad program, which is designed to raise awareness among healthcare professionals and students in various health programs about drug ads and promotional materials that might be untruthful or misleading, and how to report them to the FDA. The course offers continuing medical education credit for physicians and continuing education credit for other healthcare professionals. Although the target audience for the course is healthcare professionals, anyone can take the course. In addition, because students are actively engaged in forming clinical practice habits that may last throughout their careers, reaching them now with Bad Ad information could have a strong impact on how they view prescription drug promotion. To help them become discerning readers of drug promotional information, we in the Office of Prescription Drug Promotion have developed several case studies based on FDA Warning and Untitled letters issued to drug companies. The case studies, which represent common problems, can be downloaded from the Bad Ad website. We encourage medical, pharmacy, nursing, and other healthcare-related schools to incorporate these cases into their coursework. The cases cover a range of promotional materials including a website, journal ad, and TV ad, and touch upon numerous promotional practices that don’t comply with our regulations. Through the case studies, students will have an opportunity to evaluate and discuss these real-life examples of misleading drug promotion. Our new e-learning courses and cases studies are the latest of many ways the FDA works to help ensure that your healthcare professionals have truthful and accurate information when making decisions that affect your health and safety. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Thomas Abrams is the director of FDA’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.FDA Sponsors e-Learning for Evaluating Drug Promotion
Bad Ad program’s course and case studies help identify harmful and misleading ads
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Thomas Abrams
© 2023 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.