Cost for QD employees to rent an apartment in Chico, CA. $1,200/month. Please turn off your ad blocker in Quality Digest
Our landlords thank you.
Ken Miller
Published: Monday, February 22, 2016 - 17:42 I wrote last month about the need to increase security for imaging devices in hospitals. The devices I cited store both personal and medical information about patients and should be subject to standard security measures. Very often they are not. Last month the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued proposed guidelines for post-market management of cybersecurity in medical devices. The guidelines provide best practices for assessing and managing cybersecurity vulnerabilities in medical devices and include situations involving both hacker access to patient records and hacker access to the devices themselves. Although a hacker’s ability to access our private information is alarming, it’s even more distressing to consider a hacker’s ability to increase or decrease IV drips, alter pacemaker functions, or change settings on an imaging device. Networked medical devices come under the broader heading of the Internet of things (IoT), which includes anything that has an on/off switch and an Internet connection. Currently, that could be everything from cell phones, coffee makers, home security systems, and baby monitors to an airplane’s jet engine or the drill on an oil rig. Gartner, an analyst firm, predicts that there will be more than 21 billion connected devices by 2020. Security is an ongoing concern with the IoT. Every additional connection opens up another possible point of entry into networks, for legitimate users and hackers. In the rush to market to offer new features to improve ease of use or innovations in care, sometimes security is an afterthought. The FDA guidelines encourage active and ongoing evaluation of cyber risks and efforts to manage those risks for products in the marketplace. One notable omission in the guidelines, however, is any penalty for not ensuring the security of devices. Manufacturers are under no obligation to follow best practices or to change their manufacturing processes at this time. I expect competition in the marketplace will handle some reluctance to adopt the guidelines. Penalties may handle the remainder of the reservations. Stakeholders have 90 days to submit comments to the FDA before the guidelines are finalized. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Ken Miller serves as a senior manager in healthcare services at HORNE LLP, a CPA and business advisory firm. He concentrates on providing compliance consulting services in the areas of healthcare billing regulations, privacy regulations, and healthcare internal audit services.FDA Proposes Cybersecurity Guidelines for Medical Devices
Stakeholders have 90 days to submit comments to the FDA
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Ken Miller
© 2022 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.