Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
FDA Compliance Features
Jill Roberts
Another way to know what’s too old to eat
Patricia Santos-Serrao
Four pharma quality trends
Del Williams
Preventing damage caused by large, suspended particles
Kari Miller
An effective strategy requires recruiting qualified personnel familiar with the process and technology

More Features

FDA Compliance News
Now is not the time to skip critical factory audits and supply chain assessments
Google Docs collaboration, more efficient management of quality deviations
Delivers time, cost, and efficiency savings while streamlining compliance activity
First trial module of learning tool focuses on ISO 9001 and is available now
Free education source for global medical device community
Good quality is adding an average of 11 percent to organizations’ revenue growth
Further enhances change management capabilities
Creates adaptive system for managing product development and post-market quality for devices with software elements
VQIP allows for expedited review and importation for approved applicants that demonstrate safe supply chains

More News

Alberto Gutierrez

FDA Compliance

FDA Introduces Triage Pilot Program

Increasing efficiencies for device review

Published: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - 12:38

During the next few months, manufacturers of certain in vitro diagnostic and radiology products may start to notice they are getting decisions on their premarket notification submissions, aka 510(k), sooner than expected. This will be due to a six-month pilot program called Triage, launched recently by the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety, a part of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH).

The goal of Triage is to improve efficiencies in the device review process. Reviewers will focus more of their time and attention on novel and higher-risk devices, like companion diagnostics devices, and less time on devices that are lower risk and have well-known and well-understood safety and effectiveness profiles.

As the name “Triage” suggests, when certain 510(k) submissions are submitted, reviewers will make an assessment of the level of resources needed to complete a review, based on a quick assessment of the submission’s content and completeness. High-quality submissions that meet certain criteria and contain all of the information needed for a substantial equivalence evaluation will be slated for a 30-day Quick Review. Those 510(k) submissions not meeting these criteria would receive the standard review (generally 90 days) consistent with user fee performance goals.

To qualify for a 30-day Quick Review, the 510(k) submission must:
• Be well-written, organized, and contain all expected data and information to support substantial equivalence claims
• Be for a device that is well-known to the FDA
• Be for a device that does not have existing or unresolved post-market issues
• Not require an extensive review by a subject matter expert other than the reviewer assigned to the submission
• Contain a 510(k) Summary, which is a summary of the information used to support the substantial equivalence determination

This time-saving program does not mean decisions will be made in haste or rushing through the process, which invites error. The Triage pilot program will preserve the quality and transparency of the normal 510(k) review process. Reviewers will still assess the same elements as they would in a standard review, but instead will accomplish it within 30 days. If the device is found to be substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device, the 510(k) Summary will be posted online, allowing the public to see FDA’s basis for the substantial equivalence determination.

At the end of six months, the FDA plans to evaluate and refine the program. The evaluation will provide us with some simple metrics on 510(k) review times and use of resources, but the impact, we hope, will go beyond the numbers.

For manufacturers, health care practitioners, and patients, faster reviews will mean some products will be available sooner. For FDA staff, the time saved by using Quick Review can be devoted to reviewing submissions for higher-risk devices and novel technologies and to expanding their knowledge and expertise in new and emerging science. Depending on the pilot’s outcome, the CDRH may consider expanding the Triage program to other device types besides in vitro diagnostics and radiology products.

Facilitating access to safe and effective devices is a goal shared by the FDA, manufacturers, the health care community, and the public. The FDA is optimistic that the Triage pilot program can help meet that goal, and that industry will see the possibility of a 30-day review as additional incentive to submit high-quality 510(k) submissions.
 

Discuss

About The Author

Alberto Gutierrez’s picture

Alberto Gutierrez

Alberto Gutierrez, Ph.D., is the director of the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety in the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health. He joined the FDA in 1992 as a researcher and a reviewer of purity and structure of vaccine components. He served as director of FDA’s division of chemistry and toxicology devices in 2005. Gutierrez also writes for the FDA’s blog, FDA Voice. Gutierrez received a bachelor’s degree from Haverford College and master’s and doctorate degrees in chemistry from Princeton University.