Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
FDA Compliance Features
Del Williams
Options to address the risk of combustible dust explosions for NFPA 61 compliance
Doug Folsom
Unpatched vulnerabilities will become increasingly susceptible to cyberattacks
Del Williams
Mitigate risk, prevent safety issues by utilizing closed conveyor systems designed with sanitation in mind
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
Companies say they plan to pull some or all of their devices
Dirk Dusharme @ Quality Digest
First step, migrate your QMS to a cloud-based electronic quality management system

More Features

FDA Compliance News
Company’s first funding round will be used to accelerate product development for its QMS and MES SaaS offerings
Showcasing tech, solutions, and services at Gulfood Manufacturing 2022
Easy, reliable leak testing with methylene blue
Now is not the time to skip critical factory audits and supply chain assessments
Google Docs collaboration, more efficient management of quality deviations
Delivers time, cost, and efficiency savings while streamlining compliance activity
First trial module of learning tool focuses on ISO 9001 and is available now
Free education source for global medical device community
Good quality is adding an average of 11 percent to organizations’ revenue growth

More News

Scott Gottlieb

FDA Compliance

FDA Eases Application Process for Compassionate Use

FDA recognizes that time is critical for seriously ill patients who do not have alternative therapies

Published: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 - 11:01

The FDA has a long history of supporting patient access to investigational new treatments. This includes working with drug and device companies through the clinical trial process that may lead to FDA approval of the treatment. We also offer expanded access programs that provide investigational drugs and devices to patients with serious conditions (generally prior to product approval) when there is no therapeutic alternative.

Each year, the FDA receives more than 1,000 applications for the treatment of patients through expanded access, also known as compassionate use, and the agency authorizes the vast majority (about 99%). The FDA recognizes that time is critical for these seriously ill patients who do not have alternative therapies, and who cannot take part in a clinical trial of an investigational therapy.

Submissions are authorized quickly, often in a matter of days. In the case of emergencies, the FDA will typically provide authorization over the phone in a matter of hours. In an effort to eliminate potential hurdles that might delay or even discourage applications, the FDA streamlined the expanded-access process by introducing a new application form that a physician may use to request expanded access for her patient. Form FDA 3926 reduced the number of required information fields and attachments, and is estimated to take only 45 minutes for a physician to complete. Before expanded access can occur, the drug company must decide whether to provide the product. The FDA cannot require a manufacturer to provide a product.

Now, we’re lifting another potential burden for physicians who apply to the FDA to use an investigational drug to treat their patient.

Prior to treating a patient under expanded access, the physician must obtain approval from the institutional review board (IRB) at his facility. This is an important step to protect the rights, safety, and well-being of human subjects in clinical research—but assembling the full board may cause delays because it may not routinely meet.

As part of a plan to simplify the process for physicians seeking access to an investigational product to treat their patient, I’ve announced that just one IRB member—the chair or another appropriate person—can now approve the treatment. I believe the simplified IRB process will facilitate access while still protecting patients.

More simplifications and clarifications are in the pipeline.

We’ve seen some reluctance among companies to provide investigational drugs for expanded access. This may have been due, in part, to uncertainty about how data for adverse events that occur during treatment under expanded access are viewed by the FDA. Companies have voiced concerns that any apparent negative effects might jeopardize the product’s development.

We recognize that patients receiving expanded access are usually treated outside of a controlled clinical trial setting. As a result, they may have more advanced disease than clinical trial participants, be receiving other drugs at the same time, and have other diseases. The FDA recognizes that these factors make it more difficult to determine the cause an adverse reaction.

To clarify how adverse event data in these circumstances are viewed, we’ve updated the guidance for industry titled, “Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs for Treatment Use: Questions and Answers” (questions 25 and 26). The guidance clarifies that suspected adverse reactions must be reported “only if there is evidence to suggest a causal relationship between the drug and the adverse event.”

I’m confident these changes will help to address recent issues raised by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which said that the FDA “should further clarify how adverse event data are used.” We are still evaluating the GAO recommendations to identify other possible ways to respond to their concerns.

We’re committed to helping patients and physicians fully understand the expanded access process. Dedicated staff in the Office of Health and Constituent Affairs and the CDER’s Office of Communications, Division of Drug Information, already assist physicians and patients in navigating this system. We issued three final guidance documents last year to clarify and explain the process. This past July, we collaborated with the Reagan-Udall Foundation, patient advocacy groups, the pharmaceutical industry, and other federal agencies to launch a new online tool called the Expanded Access Navigator. This includes a directory where companies can submit public links to their expanded access policies, the criteria used by companies to determine whether to make a drug available through expanded access, and contact information. The directory offers patients and physicians a helpful starting point for researching available investigational therapies.

In addition, we’re working with the Reagan-Udall Foundation to expand this new tool. I’m pleased to announce that Reagan-Udall will expand its portfolio to include the FDA’s Rare Disease Program, with the goal of promoting more expanded access to treatments for rare disorders.

Looking ahead, there will be more options for expanded access. The FDA will continue its efforts to educate stakeholders on these opportunities and further simplify the process in order to improve the program.


About The Author

Scott Gottlieb’s picture

Scott Gottlieb

Scott Gottlieb, M.D., is the commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.