Our PROMISE: Our ads will never cover up content.
Our children thank you.
Hubert Gatignon
Published: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 - 13:47 There can be little argument that consumers are growing more suspicious of business. They question its motives, and increasingly, its marketing, which recently has been said to be manipulative. Consumers are ever more aware of the Internet pop-ups and exaggerated claims they receive in a targeted fashion, especially on social media channels. Cass Sunstein, a Harvard Law professor and former administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, recently published an essay in the Journal of Marketing Behavior that discussed how manipulation is indeed pervasive in daily life, both in public and commercial realms, and is especially prevalent in marketing. Sunstein believes “those who sell products are engaged in at least arguable forms of manipulation.” Sunstein defines manipulation as something that does not sufficiently engage or appeal to someone’s capacity for reflective and deliberative choice. But this is problematic. Many choices are made without reflective deliberation. Furthermore, the notion of consumers making cognitive and purely rational decisions is a myth at best. Customers are also becoming more aware of marketing’s motives and its tactics, from price discrimination and discounts to loyalty programs and atmospherics, and may discount it in their decisions. Nevertheless, in a reply article, I point out that this awareness is understandably leading to perceptions that marketers are manipulating customers. But marketing is not, and should not be considered, manipulation. Given the pervasiveness of the perception that marketers are manipulators, I suggest that the profession, both academics and practitioners, should be proactive in changing these viewpoints. To do this, we should turn to the broader definition of manipulation to examine whether this is what marketing is. According to a definition used in the book Who’s Pulling Your Strings? by Harriet B. Braiker, Ph.D. (McGraw-Hill Education, first edition, 2004): “...psychological manipulation is a type of social influence that aims to change the perception or behavior of others through underhanded, deceptive, or abusive tactics.” To say, therefore, that marketing uses deceit and abusive tactics would be inaccurate. If marketers employ covert tactics to manipulate customers, then they run the risk of being seen as unethical. Take the example of subliminal advertising, where viewers are exposed to information that slips below their conscious awareness. Such practices caused moral outrage in 1957 when it emerged that moviegoers had been exposed to split-second advertisements of Coca-Cola and popcorn without their conscious knowledge. Such practices have been banned in the United Kingdom ever since, and it’s still unclear whether the practice even works to influence purchase decisions. As we saw in the case of Volkswagen, where customers were falsely led to believe their cars had lower emissions than they really did, deception was not only detrimental to the customer relationship but to the firm as a whole, landing it in legal hot water. Telemarketing ploys, such as the use of surveys to mask the true intentions of the caller and then pressing customers to commit to a purchase are widely shunned. To counter the perception that businesses are deceitful, marketing should seek to be a social influence, specifically the kind that is not exerted covertly and does not use deception or abuse to achieve its aims. Given increasing awareness of marketing tricks among consumers, marketers need to approach customers with sustainability in mind. While it’s true that the marketers of the 1930s used to think of their job as directing the flow of products to consumers in a one-way fashion, marketing professionals today are coalescing around the notion of exchange between customers and producers, focusing on value for the customer. This can be seen in crowdsourcing and push-and-pull strategies in social media. L’Oréal, for instance, created a product in response to online customer chatter around a new hairstyle. Exchange in this way implies agreement and is a status quo that customers not only accept but take part in. Organizations should think long-term in such marketing efforts. Most marketing classes I teach start off with a debate about whether marketers are filling needs or creating them to sell products. This is tricky territory. Who could say consumers wanted iPhones until they were shown the product? Luckily for the profession, the era of big data gives us a golden opportunity to understand customers more deeply than ever before, provided the practice is conducted transparently. Facebook’s famed experiment in which it purposefully manipulated users’ feeds by changing what appeared in front of them in order to study how this affected their behavior, caused widespread condemnation, and rightly so. Marketers should aim to create sustained value, considering both the long-term and short-term motivations in marketing a product or service. This will mean the closer study of customers; the creation of experiences—not just products and services; developing equitable relationships with customers; and considering the impact of all practices on society more broadly. Only then will we be able to counter the perception that marketing is manipulative. This article is republished courtesy of INSEAD Knowledge. © INSEAD 2016. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Hubert Gatignon is the Claude Janssen Chaired Professor of Business Administration at INSEAD, and a professor of marketing, teaching on the INSEAD campus in Fontainebleau, France. He joined INSEAD in 1994 from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania where he was the professor of marketing. He holds a Ph.D. in marketing from the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches from Université Paul Cézanne-Aix Marseille. Gatignon’s research interests involve marketing strategy, especially innovation strategies, and international marketing strategy. Manipulating Consumers Is Not Marketing
Are marketers filling needs or creating them?
Influence, don’t manipulate
Change the perception
Management practices for marketers
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Hubert Gatignon
© 2023 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.