PROMISE: Our kitties will never sit on top of content. Please turn off your ad blocker for our site.
puuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrr
Shabnam Azimi
Published: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 - 12:01 Consumers who have a personality that scores high in terms of openness—such as being open to new adventures and intellectually curious—have better success at spotting fake reviews than other personality types, according to our recently published research. Extroverted people, on the other hand, tend to have a harder time identifying a fake review. To reach these conclusions, we compiled reviews from a unique data set of 1,600 Chicago hotel reviews, marked as either fake or real, that was compiled by artificial intelligence engineer and researcher Myle Ott and his team for peer-reviewed research they published in 2011 and 2013. Ott and colleagues mined real reviews from travel review websites such as Tripadvisor, Hotels.com, and Expedia, which have a reasonably small deception rate. They gathered fake reviews by using Amazon Mechanical Turk to recruit people to write fake hotel reviews that sounded truthful. We then used Amazon Mechanical Turk to recruit 400 participants and asked them to imagine they needed to choose a hotel for a planned trip to Chicago. Each participant was assigned a hotel, read eight reviews about it, guessed at which ones were fake, and explained why they seemed fake or real. The eight reviews were a balanced set of two positive fake, two positive real, two negative fake, and two negative real, shown in a randomized order. Participants then answered questions designed to assess where they rank in terms of the big five personality types: extroversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism. Overall, we found that consumers generally trust negative reviews more than positive ones. In evaluating whether an online review is genuine, consumers frequently underestimate the number of negative reviews that can be fake, while assuming that some positive reviews might be fake. When we asked our participants why they thought a negative review was trustworthy, we found that they didn’t fully take into account that the writer might be motivated to post the review out of a desire to harm the business—for example, hostile competitors or angry customers. We also found that readability, length, and content affected perceptions of the review. Study participants were more likely to trust positive reviews when the sentences were short, and more likely to trust negative reviews when the sentences were long. Shorter negative reviews with less emotional content were also more believable. And in terms of personality type, while participants scoring high on openness were best at spotting fake reviews, and those with more extroversion did the worst, it was only for positive reviews. All personality types did pretty poorly at weeding out fake negative reviews. Consumers consider online reviews to be among the most important sources of information for making buying decisions. However, according to a 2019 report by Which?, the U.K.’s consumer champion organization, many of these reviews on popular websites such as Amazon are fakes. But consumers are consistently bad at detecting fake reviews in their buying decisions. Our research could help consumers become more aware of how they respond to reviews, especially negative ones. Our research identified certain features in the length, wording, and structure of online reviews, as well as consumer personality types, that lead consumers to trust online reviews. We still don’t know why these features convey trustworthiness to consumers or why they differ for positive vs. negative reviews. This article was first published on Jan. 12, 2023, by The Conversation. Quality Digest does not charge readers for its content. We believe that industry news is important for you to do your job, and Quality Digest supports businesses of all types. However, someone has to pay for this content. And that’s where advertising comes in. Most people consider ads a nuisance, but they do serve a useful function besides allowing media companies to stay afloat. They keep you aware of new products and services relevant to your industry. All ads in Quality Digest apply directly to products and services that most of our readers need. You won’t see automobile or health supplement ads. So please consider turning off your ad blocker for our site. Thanks, Shabnam Azimi is an assistant professor of marketing at Loyola University Chicago’s Quinlan School of Business, and also teaches courses in digital marketing and digital marketing analytics. Her expertise is in information processing and consumer decision-making.Consumers Often Can’t Detect Fake Reviews
They also underestimate how many negative reviews might be fakes
The big idea
Why it matters
What still isn’t known
Our PROMISE: Quality Digest only displays static ads that never overlay or cover up content. They never get in your way. They are there for you to read, or not.
Quality Digest Discuss
About The Author
Shabnam Azimi
© 2023 Quality Digest. Copyright on content held by Quality Digest or by individual authors. Contact Quality Digest for reprint information.
“Quality Digest" is a trademark owned by Quality Circle Institute, Inc.