I hate the use of the word just in front of anyone’s title, as in, “He’s just an analyst,” or, “She’s just a cafeteria worker,” or, “I’m just an administrative assistant.”
ADVERTISEMENT |
No one is just anything. The word is demeaning and pejorative. We’re all people—we happen to have different responsibilities. The connotation of just is that someone is worth less than someone else, as if that just someone has a defect.
One of the most powerful leadership skills I’ve seen and used is valuing everyone’s contributions equally. How do you do that? Simple: Treat everyone like a person and an equal first and foremost. The work sorts itself out in the end.
For example, I walked by a senior vice president’s office one day. I knew his assistant—she was a wonderful lady. We got to talking, and she mentioned a problem she saw regarding how assistants were paid. I told her, “You see it, you own it. Raise the issue and see if you can get it fixed.”
“But I’m just an admin,” she said.
I promptly and pointedly corrected her. “No. You’re an admin for a senior vice president. The word just isn’t in your job description. You know what’s wrong. You know who can fix it and what the right answer is. The thing is, if you act like you don’t deserve a seat at the table, you’ll never get one.”
Later that day, she raised the issue with the SVP. He was completely unaware of the problem. Needless to say, said admin led the team that eventually put the fix in place.
Just is a simple yet incredibly damaging word. If you find yourself using it in the context of your own title, make a conscious effort to stop. All you’re doing is devaluing yourself.
More important, take off the lens of just when you look at others. He’s not just a cafeteria worker. His name is Angel, and he’s a great guy who always has a smile on. He reliably fills the coffee machine every day and takes great pride in his work. He’s polite and customer-focused. He makes a great grilled provolone on white sandwich (my comfort food). Maybe you should take a moment to get to know him. It’s funny; once you remove the just blinders, you learn things. I don’t see just a cafeteria worker. I see Angel—the model of customer service. I wish I had 300 of him working in my customer service call centers. If I did, I’d never have a customer service issue that wasn’t solved quickly, politely, and correctly.
There’s a side benefit to this approach. People will see how you treat others and decide whether they want to work for you or not. If they see you all high and mighty because everyone is just beneath you, then you’re going to have a hard time building a following. Conversely, if people see you treat everyone around you with dignity and respect, they’ll at least consider following you and give you the benefit of the doubt in your interactions with them.
A final point on just: You never know who that just someone knows. When I was a consultant, we regularly interviewed a slew of candidates on Fridays. The first person they met was the receptionist. From there, they’d interview with eight or nine of us, and we’d hold a “consensus meeting” at the end of the day to determine whether we were going to make a job offer.
One exceptional candidate (let’s call him “Bill”) did an amazing job in all eight of his interviews. He was brilliant, charming, and energetic. All of us were excited about him as we entered the consensus meeting. Some of us were already fighting over who would get him on their team first. As we discussed his glowing performance, it was abundantly clear we’d be making him an offer. We prepared to close the discussion and asked, “Does anyone else have anything to offer on Bill?”
“I do,” said the receptionist.
“Go ahead,” said the meeting moderator.
“When he came in, I was on the phone. He tapped his pen impatiently on my desk indicating I should stop talking on the phone and help him. I asked my caller, who happened to be the office director, to wait a moment. The conversation then went like this:
“Can I help you?”
“Yeah. I’m here to interview. Don’t you know who I am?”
“I’m sorry, sir, I don’t.”
“Geez. Look in your paperwork. Bill. Bill Farfegnugen. Isn’t it your job to receive guests properly?”
“Yes. Please have a seat. They’ll be with you shortly.”
“Aren’t you going to take my coat and get me a cup of coffee?”
“Sure. I’d be happy to. Cream and sugar?”
“Yeah.”
“After I got him his coffee, I showed him to his first interview. I’m sorry, but I simply can’t see this guy in front of our clients. I can’t recall the last time someone was that rude to me.”
Needless to say, Bill didn’t get a job offer. He probably wonders why to this very day, because he knew he smoked his interviews. Hey, Bill, news flash: She’s not just a receptionist. Her name is Lois, and she takes really good care of the people around her. Had you done the same, you might have gotten the job.
Just is a poisonous word in the context of people. Make it go away.
Published July 17, 2024, in The thoughtLEADERS Brief on LinkedIn.
Comments
The word "just"
I couldn't agree more with your discouraging the use of just in describing a person's position within an organization. It can be demeaning and de-motivating. Treat everyone with respect and you will be surprised at the result. Keep preaching!
"Just" an Interested Reader
“But I’m just an admin,” she said.
Mike, I'm grateful and impressed that you have the passion and the influence to post this content on Quality Digest -- but I have to ask -- what are you trying to accomplish? Personally, I don't think just came from the admin. It came from the way she was perennially treated, job after job, work culture after work culture. Same thing goes the engineer. The 'individual contributor' at any tech firm or pharma, or biotech, etc. Especially the big ones, but all of them. I can only name one that was an exception in my 15+ year career and in my conversations with countless peers and myriad people outside of my work environment in positions at similar levels. I don't think you'll reach executive leadership at these levels: they are unfortunately the ones who promulgate this kind of thinking at the individual contributor level. Why? They may actually be nice people who treat people well enough. But it's not their behavior. It's the structure. The Indvidual contributor is given a small desk in an open office. They are given little decision-making power, or all of the decision-making power, they are the most stressed because they see and feel the impact of business problems (not their leadership teams). They are given the least environment for concentration (no office or even a cubicle with four walls). We ultimately have to claim personal responsibility in any role, I firmly believe that. But how will we be truly empowered to cast of the word "just" when the systems and cultures that drive our individual contributors are disempowering them?
Just a thought...
Last weekend I read a great management essay - Dr. Seuss' 'Yertle the Turtle'- to my granddaughter. Why is this relevant? Take a look at an org chart - any org chart. The C-suite level is at the top, supported by all those 'underlings'. Looking at the org chart where I work, I have actually referred to myself as 'The annoying little quality turd stuck on the heel of manufacturing operations.'
If leadership really wants to promote the idea that all staff should be treated as people first, maybe stop stacking those boxes under themselves and turn that chart upside-down. I've yet to see an inverted org chart, where the leadership level is the foundation supporting all those little bricks that actually do the work and make the organization a success. Isn't that their real role? As long as the chart shows how they 'rule over', the perception can't change.
Add new comment