The quality business is all about producing a quality product, right? By that I mean a product that looks and performs just like it was promised. Well, based on the amount of poor quality items and service that I see the quality business is apparently not doing a very good job. I’d guess that there are at least 180,000 souls who make their living in the quality business—inspectors, quality engineers, quality managers, Black Belts, scrap dealers, and lawyers. Despite their efforts, product quality in the United States and in the world is not good at all, in fact it stinks. I’ll give you a couple of examples.
No, I’ll let you find your own. Do a web search for the word “recall” and stand by for a shock. Just about every major business has a recall; stuff they sold and now have to take back, or fix. Millions of trucks, thousand of baby items, drugs, washing machines, a zillion pounds of hamburger—all are being recalled because of poor quality. Didn’t they know how to make those products right in the first place? We have been making automobiles for a hundred years. Why can’t they be made right? Recall a million trucks? Wow! If tons of hamburger meat are tossed out, it makes one wonder about the tons and tons before they got to the bad product.
Way back in 1969, as a board member of the American Society for Zero Defects, I had the job of selling the government on the zero defects idea. I made up a presentation for President Richard Nixon. It was all set when world events took over and left me sitting outside the White House with my presentation under my arm. I still have that presentation material. The title is “There is a Quality Crisis in America.” And you know what? If I changed the president’s name from Nixon to Obama, I could give that presentation today. Hmm, I wonder… well, anyway, I could have given the presentation without any changes to presidents Ford, Reagan, Clinton, George W., and his daddy. From a quality standpoint, not much has changed between Nixon and Obama.
Was it always that way? Did quality always stink? I don’t know. What I do know is this: as long as I have been in the business, it’s been an uphill battle to get a quality product out; a battle with all those folks who—for some unknown reason—don’t consider quality important. And I’m not alone. I’ve talked with hundreds, maybe thousands of quality managers throughout the years. Every single one had a quality horror story. They spend their days, their weeks, their whole careers fighting to get people to do the right thing and to do it correctly. Is that the way it should be? Why do we even need a quality staff? Can’t people do their job without someone looking over their shoulder?
I’ve worked for three major corporations and the U.S. Army. Out of that mix, one corporation and the Army really cared about quality. I left the Army to join RCA as corporate director of quality improvement. Little did I know that it was a suicide mission. I was actually called into 30 Rock, and chewed out by top management for spending a couple hundred bucks on a pamphlet to promote quality. RCA management didn’t care about quality, and due to lousy quality and lousy management, RCA is now gone.
RCA is not a special case. Very, very few corporation managers really care about quality. They say they do—they trot out their motherhood quality policy—but they don’t really mean it. I hear their screams, but I’m right.
It’s just been reported that Toyota might have hidden information about its quality problems. Is it the first to do that? Come on!
So, why is there still a quality crisis in America? Do we need more Black Belts? Quality managers? Inspectors? I can sum it up the problem in three words, “The Big Boss.” There’s an old saying in the quality business, “The product looks like the management.” The products of every business look just like “The Big Boss”—who may be the CEO, the president, and even the plant manager. Somebody is at the top of every organization and that somebody determines the quality of the product. I wonder if they are proud of the way they are viewed by others. I’ll bet it’s not fun explaining the recall of one million trucks to the board of directors.
The problem is that “The Big Boss”—and most of the little bosses—are more interested in the stock price than the defect level. That’s the way they were brought up and trained. They don’t understand that the stock price and the quality level are directly connected. Ask Toyota. Profit is important and necessary, but profit at the expense of quality spells disaster. It’s like the no-free-lunch mantra,“Quality is free,” but you have to do something to get it and to keep it.
The cure for lousy quality is simple and easy. “The Big Boss” only needs to establish the correct performance standard and provide the wherewithal for quality to happen. It’s as simple as that. If you’re The Big Boss, do it. If you’re not, shove this article under his or her door.
Sign In to get started!
Comments
Quality crisis
A couple points in response:
- I get a little dismayed when I read these articles that bash the big boss. Maybe some big bosses have reservations about committment to quality because so many quality professionals (leaders in this case?) continue to bash them. Maybe they view the quality profession with skepticism because they know that the quality guys are likely to blame them for all the problems being their fault.
- Which brings me to another point - the writer of articles about quality playing the "blame game". The same authors would encourage you to look at the system and not find fault with the users if they were writing a politically correct article about problem solving in your plant. They might criticize managers for searching for who to blame instead of solving the problem with the system. But in this case - we jump right to the blame and do not consider if it is a system issue.
- Leading in to the next point - yes view this quality "crisis" as a system issue. The system is delivering results in accordance with it's capability. The American system has created this, not the leaders of manufacturing companies. Everything needs to be cheaper. It drives things everywhere. Advertisers, retailers, consumers, and yes - quality professionals, all are driven by the almighty dollar. The old saying - "they don't make 'em like they used to" is no accident. You asked for it! Good luck trying to change it - seems like low odds to influence change by placing blame on business leaders though.
Corporate Profit versus Long Range Planning
1. The biggest obstacle to long term improvement is the short term hit you take in profits while changes are being implementing and haven't shown fruition. Time after time improvement projections will be abandoned because management will change their mind in face of the bottom line.
2. The biggest danger to sustained quality is tough times and good times. Tough times pressure management to cut quality to improve the bottom line and good times pressure management to expand even though the company isn't structurally ready for it.
3. In the 1940's american meat was second to none but in 1950 we switched from grass fed to grain fed cattle.
To help the consumer, the customer? Not on your life! Grain is cheaper and more abundant than grass. The
bottom line ruined a world class product.
American meat
Our beef if still the best in the world. Have you tried a steak overseas ? Canada ? China ?(ouch)
Demand forced us to go to grain feeding. Look at the population growth after the war. Do you know that in the early 1900's it was predicted that we would run out of food to feed the world if changes weren't made ? Adapt to the times, that's business.
automotive quality
With all the technology that goes into todays cars, I am impressed with the level of quality we are at. If we waited to prove out all our advances, we would be lagging 25 years in developements. I love the quality guys
that live in a dream world where nothing should go wrong....Quality is and always will be a "a work in progress!"
Here's a great idea. Let's engineer a great new idea and then test it for 10 years to make sure everything works as designed. LOL
The cure
The problem is that Six Sigma has sent quality back to the stone age. The basic principles laid down by Deming have been forgotten. Instead, the masses waste their time on the utter nonsense of counting to 3.4 defects.
The cure is to get back to Deming and the basics.
I agree. Six Sigma is an
I agree. Six Sigma is an attempt to do Deming light--and it turns into MBO because the "Big Bosses"
don't have the staying power to look long term. You can't pick and choose which of the 14 points to adopt or which of the seven deadly sins to avoid. Instead you need to "institute leadership" and develop profound knowledge. It's always "American Management and the Quick Fix".
Be a better customer
I can't help but think of Peter Glen's (services) view in "It's Not My Department"-- we all have to be better customers if we're going to change quality. That means we have to tell the provider exactly what we want, how and when we want it, and MAKE them give it to us JUST THAT WAY. If not, we're being bad customers, because the provider will then think they are building (or providing a service) to proper specs. In practice, we probably won't go back and buy from a provider who produces defects. However, if we refuse to accept poor quality, both parties should in the end get what they want - a satisfied buyer.
American's acceptance of poor Quality
I enjoyed this article but I have to also say that we Americans as a whole have contributed to the Quality Crisis in America by accepting poor quality. What I mean by that is how many of us have when purchasing a car or an appliance or any type of electronics have also purchased additional (extended) warranties at the same time? In my opinion that is that same as saying yes I know it is probably not made as well as it should be and it's OK because I still want it. When I do any type of process / quality training in the company I work for, the first thing I say is don't except poor quality in your personnel life because then you will accept poor quality in your work.
Quality Crisis in America article
Good article. Point made is right on. One suggestion: A zero defects guy should proof-read his articles. Not knowing how to spell "Reagan" was a big blunder.
Our Bad
Thanks for pointing out the Regan error. We have corrected it.
Editors