This column and the next two take stock of the current state and future of the hazardous-substance-free (HSF) movement and its effects on industry, and share my perspectives on the potential effects of QC 080000 IECQ HSPM. A vision of the future: The industry will forevermore be held accountable for knowing, disclosing, and managing hazardous substances used in production processes and embedded in products.
Why such certainty? I see four significant trends at work today:
Unlike a decade ago, there is much information and opinion available related to anything that adversely affects the environment or poses a hazard to people. Of course, having information available doesn’t change the world by itself; that’s why this next trend is also a key ingredient to the socialization process. The final trend is simply greater exposure to information. Between the Internet and traditional corporate media, more and more people are becoming aware of hazardous-substance issues. It’s not just that there’s more information out there, it’s that this information is getting broadcast more often and and getting stuck in our faces where it cannot be ignored.
The news on television, radio, and the Internet in many countries is full of stories about how people’s lives are affected by chemicals, tainted food, exposure to radiation, and disease from tainted water supplies. Products are marketed as green and environmentally friendly, which again creates a constant barrage to remind us that these values should be important in what we buy and what we do.
What else do we know about today?
We know that these trends are accelerating. The global green movement and the world’s business community are being propelled and affected by these four trends. We know that the electronics and electrical goods industries have yet to emerge from the chaos brought on by the European Union’s bold move to regulate six hazardous substances and the similar regulatory restrictions rising up around the globe. Some companies have responded with very costly and questionable routines of supplier questionnaires, self-declarations, and elaborate testing to ensure RoHS compliance. Now, looking at what they have created, many of those companies are beginning to seek a more rational, cost-effective, and sustainable approach. Still, sadly, many companies have yet to fully address hazardous-substance management and global regulatory compliance.
We also know that we have yet to see a major enforcement episode from the European Union. So far, there have been no major, visible enforcement penalties: no big fines or legal complaints, no having companies or their products barred from the marketplace. Will this come? Probably. For now it appears that EU regulators are working quietly behind the scenes to address noncompliance issues. Will China or California or some other non-European country take a more aggressive approach? Will European nations have to become more aggressive in their enforcement or make an example of some company that doesn’t get with the program? Many companies are waiting for a major enforcement action before engaging in the activities needed to manage their hazardous substances to a higher standard than in the past.
Next month, I’ll share with you my predictions for industry for the near future.
Sign In to get started!