|  Dramatic Statistics, Tragic Flaw    One of Greer Grate & Gate’s 
                      customers, Mandible Manacle Manufacturing, makes handcuffs 
                      and sells them to law enforcement agencies throughout the 
                      United States and Singapore. After an unfortunate spate 
                      of separations and failures in cuffs used to restrain criminals, 
                      MMM has insisted on higher quality throughout its manufacturing 
                      processes and has demanded that Greer Grate & Gate’s 
                      components be produced with a CpK of at least 1.   For Hartford Simsack, this is a piece of cake. In fact, 
                      he sees this as an opportunity to instruct--and hopefully 
                      impress--his assistant, Aiden Abett. He begins by writing 
                      formulas on a whiteboard.  The data comprise 14 samples, with sample sizes of two: 
  His calculations look like this: 
 In this case:  
 To calculate the CpK, Simsack explains that one should 
                      divide the smaller Z value by three: 
  Simsack has no doubt impressed Abett, although the student’s 
                      eyes have glazed over slightly. “That’s all 
                      there is to it,” Simsack concludes.  A week later, Abett brings Simsack a printout of the same 
                      data, with the X-bar and R charts as well as the histogram 
                      that he’s created from the data. Puzzled, he asks 
                      Simsack to explain the points that seem out of specification. 
                      Simsack dismisses the printout as a computer error because 
                      “Everyone knows that a CpK of 1 or more shows that 
                      you’re making virtually all good parts.”  Is Simsack correct in his observation?  Simsack is, of course, incorrect--again.  Arrogant enough to dismiss any obligation to check his 
                      conclusions, Simsack failed to check the two critical assumptions 
                      that are vital to capability studies:  The X-bar and R chart must indicate that the process is 
                      in control.
  Data must conform to a normal distribution.
  As the charts below indicate, Simsack’s data violate 
                      not one but both assumptions. Unfortunately, this means 
                      his conclusion--that a CpK of 1.17 represents a great accomplishment--is 
                      tragically flawed, especially when the printout shows 21.4 
                      percent of the data are out of specifications. 
  Michael J. Cleary, Ph.D., founder and president of 
                      PQ Systems Inc., is a professor emeritus of management science 
                      at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio.
 |