As markets shrink, companies are scrambling to boost customer satisfaction and keep their current customers rather than
devoting additional resources to chase potential new customers. The claim that it costs five to eight times as much to get new customers than to hold on to old ones is key to understanding the
drive toward benchmarking and tracking customer satisfaction.
Measuring customer satisfaction is a relatively new concept to many companies that have been focused exclusively on income statements and balance sheets. Companies
now recognize that the new global economy has changed things forever. Increased competition, crowded markets with little product differentiation and years of continual sales growth followed by
two decades of flattened sales curves have indicated to today's sharp competitors that their focus must change.
"The gulf between
satisfied customers and
customers can swallow
--Harvard Business Review,
Competitors that are prospering in
the new global economy recognize that meas-uring customer satisfaction is key. Only by doing so can they hold on to the customers they have and understand how
to better attract new customers. The competitors who will be successful recognize that customer satisfaction is a critical strategic weapon that can bring increased
market share and increased profits.
The problem companies face, however, is exactly how to do all of this and do it
well. They need to understand how to quantify, measure and track customer satisfaction. Without a clear and accurate sense of what needs to be measured and
how to collect, analyze and use the data as a strategic weapon to drive the business, no firm can be effective in this new business climate. Plans constructed using
customer satisfaction research results can be designed to target customers and processes that are most able to extend profits.
Too many companies rely on outdated and unreliable measures of customer satisfaction. They watch sales volume. They listen to sales reps describing their
customers' states of mind. They track and count the frequency of complaints. And they watch aging accounts receivable reports, recognizing that unhappy customers
pay as late as possible--if at all. While these approaches are not completely without value, they are no substitute for a valid, well-designed customer satisfaction surveying program.
It's no surprise to find that market leaders differ from the rest of the industry in that they're designed to hear the voice of the customer and achieve customer
satisfaction. In these companies:
Marketing and sales employees are primarily responsible for designing (with
customer input) customer satisfaction surveying programs, questionnaires and focus groups.
Top management and marketing divisions champion the programs.
Corporate evaluations include not only their own customer satisfaction ratings but also those of their competitors.
Satisfaction results are made available to all employees.
Customers are informed about changes brought about as the direct result of
listening to their needs.
Internal and external quality measures are often tied together.
Customer satisfaction is incorporated into the strategic focus of the company via the mission statement.
Stakeholder compensation is tied directly to the customer satisfaction surveying program.
A concentrated effort is made to relate the customer satisfaction measurement
results to internal process metrics.
To be successful, companies need a customer satisfaction surveying system that meets the following criteria:
The system must be relatively easy to design and understand.
It must be credible enough that employee performance and compensation can be attached to the final results.
It must generate actionable reports for management.
Defining customer satisfaction
Because the concept of customer satisfaction is new to many companies, it's important to be clear on exactly what's meant by the term.
Customer satisfaction is the state of mind that customers have about a company when their expectations have been met or exceeded over the lifetime of the product
or service. The achievement of customer satisfaction leads to company loyalty and product repurchase. There are some important implications of this definition:
Because customer satisfaction is a subjective, nonquantitative state, measurement
won't be exact and will require sampling and statistical analysis.
Customer satisfaction measurement must be undertaken with an understanding of the gap between customer expectations and attribute performance perceptions.
There should be some connection between customer satisfaction measurement
and bottom-line results.
"Satisfaction" itself can refer to a number of different facts of the relationship with
a customer. For example, it can refer to any or all of the following:
Satisfaction with the quality of a particular product or service
Satisfaction with an ongoing business relationship
Satisfaction with the price-performance ratio of a product or service
Satisfaction because a product/service met or exceeded the customer's expectations
Each industry could add to this list according to the nature of the business and the specific relationship with the customer. Customer satisfaction measurement
variables will differ depending on what type of satisfaction is being researched. For example, manufacturers typically desire on-time delivery and adherence to
specifications, so measures of satisfaction taken by suppliers should include these critical variables.
Clearly defining and understanding customer satisfaction can help any company identify opportunities for product and service innovation and serve as the basis for
performance appraisal and reward systems. It can also serve as the basis for a customer satisfaction surveying program that can ensure that quality improvement
efforts are properly focused on issues that are most important to the customer.
Objectives of a customer satisfaction surveying program
Customer Satisfaction Measurement Facts
- A 5-percent increase in loyalty can increase profits by 25%-85%.
- A very satisfied customer is nearly six times more likely to be loyal and to repurchase and/or recommend your product than is a customer who is just satisfied.
- Only 4 percent of dissatisfied customers will complain.
- The average customer with a problem eventually tells nine other people.
- Satisfied customers tell five other people about their good treatment.
In addition to a clear statement
defining customer satisfaction, any successful surveying program must have a clear set of objectives that, once met, will lead to improved performance. The most basic
objectives that should be met by any surveying program include the following:
Understanding the expectations and requirements of all your customers
Determining how well your company and its competitors are satisfying these expectations and requirements
Developing service and/or product standards based on your findings
Examining trends over time in order to take action on a timely basis
Establishing priorities and standards to judge how well you've met these goals
Before an appropriate customer satisfaction surveying program can be designed, the following basic questions must be clearly answered:
How will the information we gather be used?
How will this information allow us to take action inside the organization?
How should we use this information to keep our customers and find new ones?
Careful consideration must be given to what the organization hopes to accomplish, how the results will be disseminated to various parts of the organization and how the
information will be used. There is no point asking customers about a particular service or product if it won't or can't be changed regardless of the feedback.
Conducting a customer satisfaction surveying program is a burden on the organization and its customers in terms of time and resources. There is no point in
engaging in this work unless it has been thoughtfully designed so that only relevant and important information is gathered. This information must allow the organization
to take direct action. Nothing is more frustrating than having information that indicates a problem exists but fails to isolate the specific cause. Having the
purchasing department of a manufacturing firm rate the sales and service it received on its last order on a scale of 1 (terrible) to 7 (magnificent) would yield little about
how to improve sales and service to the manufacturer.
The lesson is twofold. First, general questions are often not that helpful in customer
satisfaction measurement, at least not without many other more specific questions attached. Second, the design of an excellent customer satisfaction surveying
program is more difficult than it might first appear. It requires more than just writing a few questions, designing a questionnaire, calling or mailing some
customers, and then tallying the results.
Understanding differing customer attitudes
The most basic objective of a customer satisfaction surveying program is to generate valid and consistent customer feedback (i.e., to receive the voice of the
customer, which can then be used to initiate strategies that will retain customers and thus protect the most valuable corporate asset--loyal customers).
As it's determined what needs to be measured and how the data relate to loyalty and repurchase, it becomes important to examine the mind-set of customers the
instant they are required to make a pre-purchase (or repurchase) decision or a recommendation decision. Surveying these decisions leads to measures of customer
loyalty. In general, the customer's pre-purchase mind-set will fall into one of three categories--rejection (will avoid purchasing if at all possible), acceptance (satisfied,
but will shop for a better deal), and/or preference (delighted and may even purchase at a higher price).
This highly subjective system that customers themselves apply to their decisions is based primarily on input from two sources:
The customers' own experiences--each time they experience a product or
service, deciding whether that experience is great, neutral or terrible. These are known as "moments of truth."
The experiences of other customers--each time they hear something about a
company, whether it's great, neutral or terrible. This is known as "word-of-mouth."
There is obviously a strong connection between these two inputs. An exceptional experience leads to strong word-of-mouth recommendations. Strong
recommendations influence the experience of the customer, and many successful companies have capitalized on that link.
How does a customer satisfaction surveying manager make the connection between the survey response and the customer's attitude or mind-set regarding loyalty?
Research conducted by both corporate and academic researchers shows a relationship between survey measurements and the degree of preference or rejection
that a customer might have accumulated. When the customer is asked a customer satisfaction question, the customer's degree of loyalty mind-set (or attitude) will be
an accumulation of all past experiences and exposures that can be indicated as a score from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). It can also be captured with
other response formats with an odd number of choices (e.g., 1 to 3 or 1 to 7) to allow for a neutral response.
Obviously, the goal of every company should be to develop customers with a preference attitude (i.e., we all want the coveted preferred vendor status such that
the customer, when given a choice, will choose our company), but it takes continuous customer experience management, which means customer satisfaction
measurement, to get there--and even more effort to stay there.
About the author
Since completing his master's degree in 1998, Kevin Cacioppo has been working for the leading integrated enclosure manufacturer. In his present role as global
account leader, he has applied both theory and experience to support the world's largest semiconductor original equipment manufacturer in the United States and
abroad. His work continues to indentify, in the perception of the customer, what steps must be taken to solidify relations and secure future business. E-mail him at email@example.com .