| Crossroads or Crisis? 
Michael J. Cleary, Ph.D.mcleary@qualitydigest.com
     Recurring ISO 9001 audits can 
                      be seen as challenges or opportunities. The Chinese characters 
                      for "crisis" include "opportunity," 
                      illustrating the two-edged sword that is "challenge." 
                      To Hartford Simsack, his company's upcoming audit represents 
                      only an opportunity for a grand headache, no matter how 
                      many times he's reminded about what he might learn from 
                      it. Greer Grate & Gate's most recent audit reflected 
                      several major findings--all of which made Simsack look bad. 
                      Looking bad was what Simsack had wanted to avoid at all 
                      costs.   During the last audit, the auditor asked Simsack about 
                      a data set that showed how the company's defect rate increased 
                      as the plant temperature increased. Simsack didn't respond 
                      except with a mumble, so the auditor pressed him about analysis 
                      of the data.   Because Simsack knew only how to use X-bar and R charts, 
                      he insisted that the next step would be to use such charts 
                      to determine the relationship between defects and the temperature. 
                      When the auditor suggested that a scattergram would provide 
                      a clearer idea of the correlation, Simsack grudgingly mumbled 
                      that he would have his team look into scattergram usage. 
                      Secretly, however, he felt confident that an X-bar and R 
                      chart would serve him better--simply because he used this 
                      statistical analysis for everything else.    Checking 
                      with his mentor, Dr. Stan Deviation, at the local community 
                      college, Simsack was introduced to the concept of simple 
                      regression and immediately loved the way the term rolled 
                      off his tongue. Deviation pointed out that if one variable 
                      has an effect on a second variable, the appropriate model 
                      is simple regression. He drew an example depicting the relationship 
                      between tons of coal produced and total cost.  He went on to explain how to determine the regression 
                      line using "least squares." In this case, the 
                      regression line is defined as illustrated above.   Simsack could hardly wait to showcase his newfound knowledge 
                      in front of the auditor the following day and explain that 
                      in order to get a best fit line, all that's required is 
                      to square all the data and take the smallest (i.e., least) 
                      one.   Would Simsack's explanation be considered:  a) an opportunity for continued growth in understanding? 
                     b) yet another crisis created by his ongoing incompetence? 
                      Unfortunately, Simsack has apparently mastered only one 
                      aspect of the Chinese characters--that which pertains to 
                      crisis. His ear for statistical language doesn't match his 
                      understanding of computation.   The concept of least squares is best understood with the 
                      following diagram:    Consider the above figure with three data points that 
                      suggest a relationship between x and y of lower left to 
                      upper right. A line through these points minimizes the vertical 
                      deviations .gif) . 
                      This explains what the least squares method accomplishes. 
                      Mathematical formulas to determine the line are: 
  Formulas have their own language. Perhaps Simsack should 
                      go back to studying the richer possibilities of the concept 
                      expressed in the Chinese characters.   Michael J. Cleary, Ph.D., is a professor emeritus at Wright 
                      State University and founder of PQ Systems Inc. He has published 
                      articles on quality management and SPC in a variety of academic 
                      and professional journals. Visit his Web site at www.pqsystems.com. 
                      Letters to the editor regarding this column can be e-mailed 
                      to letters@qualitydigest.com. 
                      
 
 |