| Simsack’s Fishy Response      To everyone’s surprise 
                      but Hartford Simsack’s, he’s been invited to 
                      be a guest lecturer at his local community college. He was 
                      recommended for the position by his mentor, Professor Stan 
                      Deviation. Although he’s nearly given up on Simsack 
                      becoming a competent statistician, Deviation hopes that 
                      his student will master the subject if he, in turn, has 
                      an opportunity to teach it.   Simsack, who fails in his attempts to secure the title 
                      “professor” for his new venture, nonetheless 
                      forges ahead with plans for his first lesson. Of course 
                      he must take several days off from his position at Greer 
                      Grate & Gate because class preparation is so demanding. 
                      He decides that he’ll begin with basic data analysis 
                      to warm up his students and let them experience his own 
                      wisdom firsthand.   “Three ways of looking at data are through the concepts 
                      of central location, shape and variability,” Simsack 
                      drones. He notices that several students seem intent on 
                      his lecture, recording every word on their PDAs. Occasionally, 
                      their serious concentration is punctuated by beeps and trills, 
                      but Simsack assumes that the noises are generated by overloading 
                      their systems with formulas.   Emboldened, Simsack moves next to the concept of control 
                      charts, leading the class through an exercise on creating 
                      X-bar and R charts. A student raises her hand to ask a question--always 
                      a dangerous moment for Simsack, who only skates on the surface 
                      of understanding these concepts himself. She asks about 
                      Ishikawa diagrams, which are used by colleagues at her part-time 
                      job with a local hospital.   Because Simsack has never heard of Ishikawa diagrams, 
                      he has no idea what she’s talking about. Never at 
                      a loss, however, he recovers his composure by defining the 
                      Taguchi loss function instead. That’s the only statistical 
                      concept he knows with a Japanese name, and he assumes they 
                      must be related.   “That’s a complex statistical methodology 
                      used to measure costs when you’re off target,” 
                      he tells the student confidently. (Simsack is known for 
                      his confident attitude.)  Is Simsack himself off-target? Or did he happen to score 
                      a bull’s-eye accidentally with his definition?  a) Amazingly, he’s managed to identify the Ishikawa 
                      diagram without ever seeing one.  b) Sorry, Simsack. The only thing Taguchi and Ishikawa 
                      have in common is that they’re both named after Japanese 
                      statisticians.    The correct answer is b. Simsack is wrong again.  Taguchi is known for his work on the loss function that 
                      first gained recognition during the 1980s. The Ishikawa 
                      diagram is more commonly referred to as a “fishbone” 
                      or cause-and-effect diagram. It was developed in 1943 by 
                      Professor Kaoru Ishikawa, president of the Musachi Institute 
                      of Technology in Tokyo. 
  The Ishikawa diagram is an excellent tool to apply to 
                      problem solving. For example, in the chart above, the problem 
                      for a hospital pharmacy is identified as “late medications.” 
                      Brainstorming has elicited possible causes for this problem, 
                      recorded on appropriate “bones” or categories. 
                      The next step involves looking for the most likely cause(s), 
                      and then collecting data about the current situation with 
                      respect to that cause.  Simsack might consider an Ishikawa diagram as he analyzes 
                      problems associated with his lecturing.  Michael J. Cleary, Ph.D., founder and president of 
                      PQ Systems Inc. is a noted authority in the field of quality 
                      management and a professor emeritus of management science 
                      at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio. A 29-year professorship 
                      in management science has enabled him to conduct extensive 
                      research and garner valuable experience in expanding quality 
                      management methods. He has published articles on quality 
                      management and statistical process control in a variety 
                      of academic and professional journals.
 
 |