Quality Digest      
  HomeSearchSubscribeGuestbookAdvertise April 29, 2024
This Month
Home
Articles
Columnists
Departments
Software
Need Help?
Resources
ISO 9000 Database
Web Links
Web Links
Back Issues
Contact Us
Departments: SPC Guide

Photo: Michael J. Cleary, Ph.D.

  
   

His Kingdom for a t Value
Cal Lesterol’s data-analysis boundaries stop short of statistics.

Michael J. Cleary, Ph.D.

 

 

Cal Lesterol is a technician in the quality department of Fourlegs Furniture Manufacturing. He does his job without complaint and rarely talks to those around him, preferring instead to create his own little data analysis kingdom. He’s also somewhat diffident about his statistical skills, so his kingdom might be a little shaky, as kingdoms go.

His boss, Les Casteroyl, wants Lesterol to take greater initiative in presenting data to management. Thus, when Lesterol brings Casteroyl a scatter diagram, his interest is piqued. Lesterol had prepared a chart to show that when the outside temperature went up, the number of defects in the chair leg assembly went down. His first thought was that Fourlegs might want to relocate its plant to a climate with more hot days, but because he knew this suggestion was impractical, he’d gone to Casteroyl to ask what he should do with the data that he’d charted. The scatter diagram appears below.

 

“I think it’s time for you to present it to the management team,” his boss responded. Lesterol prepared his presentation, using elaborate color schemes to identify the dependent and independent variables and to label the X and Y axes. It was a beautiful visual aide, he thought. Unfortunately, someone asked him to explain what the implications were for the portion of the graphic labeled as the “t value.” Panicked as well as clueless, Lesterol responded vaguely that the t value represents the number of defects for each unit of temperature (t).

Was his explanation correct?

 

No, Lesterol missed the mark. The t statistic is used to test the hypothesis that there’s no relationship between X and Y.

In rejecting that hypothesis, one assumes that X is a valid predictor of Y. The formula to derive the t statistic is:

In this case, the t value on Lesterol’s printout is -18.664. Because there are 24 data points, the degrees of freedom are 22:

df = n – 2

= 24 – 2

= 22

Using an alpha value of 0.05 (the probability of rejecting the null when the null is true), the tabular t is 2.074. Because the calculated t is higher than the tabular t, the null is rejected, and one can assume that

X is a predictor of Y.

Lesterol’s logical, linguistic response has nothing to do with statistics. Fortunately, his audience paid no attention to the t value but simply let Lesterol take his chart back to his own little kingdom in the quality department for further study.

About the author

Michael J. Cleary, Ph.D., founder and president of PQ Systems Inc. is a noted authority in the field of quality management and a professor emeritus of management science at Wright State University in Dayton, Ohio. He’s published articles on quality management and statistical process control in a variety of academic and professional journals.