Featured Video
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Metrology Features
Henry Zumbrun
If something can be stressed, its reference standard stability must be considered
Guangnan Meng
Laser confocal scanning microscopy is ideal for inspecting complicated surfaces
Ryan E. Day
ACQUIP brings 3D laser tracker advantage to shipyards, power generation plants, and beyond
Andrew Nobleman
Broadcasting Coordinated Universal Time on Kauai
Nikon Metrology Inc.
Insight from Nikon’s corporate vice president, Tadashi Nakayama

More Features

Metrology News
Replace mechanical indicating applications in smallest AGD size specification class
The FDA wants medical device manufactures to succeed, new technologies in supply chain managment
A new path for local hardware connectivity
mCaliper transfers, processes, and visualizes measurement data collected with tools like digital calipers, micrometers
Robot-served vision, new force-testing products, and electronic gauges at booth No. 135532
Machine demos, technology previews, and a daily happy hour at booth No. 338319
Other exhibits will feature machine tools to demonstrate tool setting, probing, machine monitoring, and robotic gauging
Marposs Mida Laser 75P Hybrid combines a noncontact laser and touch probe in one system
LEXT OLS5000 3D laser confocal scanning microscope received a Silver award

More News

Ryan E. Day

Metrology

Maximizing Measurement Consistency with 3D Imaging

Rapid-Line Inc. uses FARO’s Cobalt Array Imager to protect customers’ quality values

Published: Thursday, October 27, 2016 - 11:40

Sponsored Content

Variability is an inherent part of the measurement process. Purely from a statistical perspective, there are no “errors,” just products and parts that are either in or out of tolerance as per specifications. But whether variance can be considered an error or not, within manufacturing environments measurement mistakes often translate to migraines and lost profit.

Measurement errors can be divided into two components: random error and systematic error. Random errors are errors in measurement that lead to measurable values being inconsistent when repeated measurements are taken. Systematic errors are errors that are not determined by chance but are introduced by an inaccuracy inherent in the system.

Although random vs. systematic is deeper than mere semantics, the challenge of reducing measurement error remains at the crux of profitability for all manufacturers. So how do you reduce measurement error? Better training? Better system? Better equipment? Sometimes all three answers are rolled up in one solution.

The company

Established in 1926, Rapid-Line Inc. is a full-service metal fabrication shop and contract manufacturer supplying a broad range of services to a variety of industries. Rapid-Line provides everything from concept through production in one modern facility.

Registration to ISO 9001 is one of the ways Rapid-Line has demonstrated dedication to protecting its customers’ quality values. Pursuant to that registration process, Rapid-Line needed to address the same measurement variations that challenge every manufacturing plant.

The challenge

“With multiple operators on multiple shifts, it’s not impossible for each operator to come up with a slightly different measurement for the same part,” says Jon Ringnalda, quality engineer at Rapid-Line. “Maybe not a lot different, but different. When you’re working with tolerances of millimeters, it matters.”

With in-house training covered by resident quality experts, Rapid-Line turned its attention to process and equipment.

“We have a CMM [coordinate measuring machine], but it takes a lot of programming, and it has a very expensive head on it,” says Ringnalda. “You can’t have just any operator go up and use it. With replacement heads costing tens of thousands of dollars, it’s too risky. The CMM also requires a specialized operator, which our shop can’t really support.”

As always, different situations call for different solutions. In Rapid-Line’s case, a 3D noncontact scanner addresses many of its needs, and the Cobalt Array Imager from FARO Technologies is the engineer’s scanner of choice.

The solution

The Cobalt utilizes blue light technology to capture millions of high-resolution, 3D coordinate measurements in seconds.

The Cobalt is equipped with dedicated onboard processors—an industry first. The smart sensor allows unique multi-imager array configurations that expand the 3D scan area to deliver rapid, automated, and comprehensive inspection. The actionable data are then displayed as a simple go/no-go result, or an easy-to-read dimensional deviation color map. An unlimited number of 3D imagers can be placed in array configurations virtually anywhere in a manufacturing process—all scanning simultaneously and controlled by a single computer.

The Cobalt is ideally suited for automated metrology applications within industries such as automotive, aerospace, metalworking, and in other sectors utilizing automation.

“The Cobalt is so simple to program,” adds Ringnalda. “It runs off the 3D CAD files that our customer provides. We use the PolyWorks software to make the data useful.”

The PolyWorks software suite (from InnovMetric Software) is flexible enough to allow an operator to cherry-pick only the particular dimensions needed at any given step in the manufacturing process or run the whole piece compared to the file. This simplifies first-piece and in-process inspection tremendously. It also has a significant positive effect on measurement deviation.

“We do a lot of custom job-shop type of work, and every order requires a first-piece inspection,” explains Ringnalda. “It’s not unusual for us to do first-piece [inspection] on 30 orders in a single day.”

In a job-shop environment, where setup and changeover is half the battle, accurate measurements are closely tied to profitability.

“For us, one of the beauties of the Cobalt imager is the hands-free aspect,” Ringnalda laughs. “It makes it pretty hard to screw up.”

The Cobalt’s flexibility is also helpful in development. Easily deployed in manual or fully automated workflows, Cobalt delivers fast and consistent measurements for dimensional inspection and reverse-engineering applications on parts, assemblies, and tooling.

“If I’m helping to make something like a fixture, I have the option to run the imager without a CAD file for reference,” says Ringnalda. “We know what part dimensions we’re looking for so we can create custom fixtures to manufacture them. Then I can use the Cobalt to take test part measurements, and we can make adjustments to the fixture as needed.”

The results

Whether deployed in multiple imager-array configurations, mounted on a robot, or tripod-mounted, the Cobalt reduces measurement error and inspection cycle times, and improves throughput and quality.

Is the Cobalt Array Imager a good fit for Rapid-Line?

“As a matter of fact, our old CMM is now for sale,” quips Ringnalda.


FARO® Cobalt array imager

Click Here
To schedule a 15-minute personalized live web demo of the
Cobalt Array Imager
or call FARO at 800-736-0234

Discuss

About The Author

Ryan E. Day’s picture

Ryan E. Day

Ryan E. Day is a Quality Digest contributing editor and principal administrator of the company’s content marketing program, which brings together those seeking business improvement solutions, and solution providers. Day has spent the last 7 years researching and interviewing top business leaders and continuous improvement experts including Sakor, Ford, Merchandize Liquidators, Olympus, 3D Systems, Hexagon Intertek, InfinityQS, Johnson Controls, FARO, and Eckel Industries. When not developing engaging and informative content, Day might be found polishing his html and css skills, or hanging out with his 20lb American Tabby cat.