Featured Product
This Week in Quality Digest Live
Innovation Features
Bill Kraus
Three components work together for operational excellence
David Mitchell
Robot is trained to match form to function—which object shapes facilitate a particular outcome
Phanish Puranam
Without a firm anchor in organizational design, fun, playful embellishments can be unwelcome additions to the workplace
Paul Foster
Creating a culture of champions
Krystle Morrison
September is Food Safety Education Month—be in the know

More Features

Innovation News
Stereotactic robot helps identify target and deliver electrodes to target with submillimetric accuracy
Examine nine ways to help understand context, diffuse politics, heal relationships, and find the right work at the right time
Inkbit is overcoming traditional constraints to 3D printing by giving its machines ‘eyes and brains’
Deep Reality Viewer creates stereo, high-definition 3D images without using a monitor
Wing’s shape shifts automatically for aerodynamic loads (e.g., takeoff, landing, cruising)
Process concerns technology feasibility, commercial potential, and transition to marketplace
Identifying the 252 needs for workforce development to meet our future is a complex, wicked, and urgent problem
How established companies turn the tables on digital disruptors
Building organizational capability and capacity to create outcomes that matter most

More News

Andy Henderson

Innovation

A Perspective of the Manufacturing Future,
Part 1

Cutting tools

Published: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - 16:29

Editor’s note: This is part one of a four-part series offering the author’s perspective on how different aspects of manufacturing may be affected in the future. Part two covers production management; in part three, inventory management; and in part four, product quality.

Some time ago, I made a vision document and road map for transforming a machining line in a more than 50-year-old, complex-discrete manufacturing plant. When I started, I approached multiple topics including part quality, cutting tool management, manufacturing asset performance, associate/operator performance, and material/production tracking. I approached the vision from the standpoint of what is technically possible and how it would work in a utopian state. In this article, I want to walk through the portion of that vision pertaining to managing cutting tools. This vision includes automation, lots of data, and artificial intelligence.

Manufacturers that conduct a lot of machining know that the cost of productivity of a machining operation is inextricably connected to selecting the cutting tool and the process for managing them. In the utopian future, the manufacturing intelligence system will automatically control how cutting tools are used, and automatically optimize the cost of machining operations.

Current state

The plant itself may be more than 50 years old, but the equipment inside has been upgraded and replaced over the years. There may be some machining centers that are less than one year old and some that are more than 20 years old. Production associates may have been with the company for less than one year or more 20 years. It’s common practice in these types of processes for a production associate to operate one to four computer numerical control (CNC) machining centers. In a discrete manufacturing plant, one operation is often conducted on a single part in a single machining center. The part is then passed to the next operation. In a complex-discrete manufacturing plant, it would be possible that the next part in the schedule is not the same as the part that just finished, and the process flow might not be the same for each subsequent part. The associates tend the parts in the machining centers, tend the cutting tools, perform quality checks, deburr the parts, and most likely tend to housekeeping and some preventive maintenance of the manufacturing equipment.

Future state

In the ideal future, there will be a significant amount of automation to augment the manual tasks of the associates. The automation will allow them to work more safely and productively.

Regarding cutting tools, there will be robotic arms removing and replacing cutting-tool assemblies in the machining centers. If tool setting is centralized, then there will be automated guided vehicles (AGV) moving carts of new and worn cutting tools between the loading area for the machining center and the centralized setting station.

The cutting-tool setting station will have another robotic arm that removes the worn end-mills, inserts (admittedly, inserts will be exceptionally tricky), drill bits, etc. from the cutter bodies. In the case of an end-mill, the robotic arm will pass the worn cutting tool in front of a vision system for the cutting edge to be inspected for wear-type and amount of wear. The analysis data from the vision system will be saved to a centralized database for that cutting tool. The cutting tool will be discarded and a “fresh” (new or reground) cutting tool will be selected and inserted into the cutting body. The AGV will return the fresh cutting tool assemblies to the machining center for those tools to go through the operation.

In the ideal future, there will be a significant amount of automation to augment the manual tasks of the associate. The automation will allow associates to work more safely and productively.

Data

Copious amounts of data are already being produced during manufacturing processes,but most of it exists in disparate systems. Some exist in the record of manufacturing execution, some on the control of the machining center, some in the quality database (or notebook), cutting-tool inventory databases, etc. The crux of this issue is linking all of the data sources together and creating a contextual relationship between each of the data items.

In the future, the actual cutting life of each tool will be captured automatically by using automatic-identification technology to identify each unique cutting tool. Complete cutting-tool genealogy will be pieced together from the cutting-tool inventory database and the product database. This actual tool life and tool genealogy will provide unprecedented visibility to the cost of machining individual features on any given part, and allow optimization of those machining costs on nearly a part-to-part basis. Sensors on the machining center will provide data to assess variations in the cutting process and the tool life at any point during the machining operation. The quality data for a particular feature will be linked to individual cutting tools and the wear amount measured by the vision system at the automated setting station. This will provide correlations needed to determine where appropriate wear limits need to be set.

Artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the way we interact with electronics as well as our ability to leverage technology. AI helped the U.S. Postal Service automatically read and process handwritten addresses on packages as far back as the late 1990s. Google uses AI in nearly everything it does. Its search function is so powerful because it learns and improves every time anyone conducts a search. Image and speech recognition has become surprisingly accurate, thanks to AI and the abundance of digital content on the internet.

Soon, the real tool-life data from machining operations will be used as feedback to AI systems, and will automatically adjust machining process parameters to optimize the machining costs of each individual part produced while maintaining part quality. If a cutting-tool vendor develops a new cutting tool, it will be introduced into the system and will be monitored throughout the process. If the machining costs, which are automatically calculated, are higher than the current process, then the new tool will be rejected by the system. If the machining costs are lower, the plant’s system will automatically order the new tool from the supplier’s system. If the plant’s demand changes, the manufacturing intelligence system will automatically adjust to drive the lowest total landed cost while meeting customer delivery dates and quality standards.

This is a glimpse into one manufacturing geek’s view of how cutting-tool management in a machining operation will be affected by technology. It’s important to note that everything described is technically feasible. In fact, most aspects have been demonstrated or are being leveraged by existing manufacturing operations. I’m waiting with bated breath to see the culmination of all of these concepts working in one cohesive system.

First published on the GE Digital blog.

Discuss

About The Author

Andy Henderson’s picture

Andy Henderson

As an industry analyst at GE Digital, Andy Henderson leverages his experience from his time as an advanced manufacturing engineer within GE Power and his research during his doctoral program to promote a vision for the future of heavy industry/discrete manufacturing and drive strategy for achieving that vision.