Content By Davis Balestracci

Davis Balestracci’s picture

By: Davis Balestracci

Twenty years ago at a great conference, I learned a wonderfully simple model summarizing the personal change process. It complements the “ABC” model—which stands for activating event, beliefs, and consequential behavior, leading to results (R)—that I described in part one.

Davis Balestracci’s picture

By: Davis Balestracci

I recently attended the annual forum of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), which is probably the leading health improvement organization in the world. The forum has grown from under 100 attendees in 1989 to almost 6,000 this year—half of whom were there for the first time—with now thousands more virtual participants. It has become a cliché that invokes my gag reflex when participants say, “Oh, I go to get my batteries charged.” And I always wonder, on hearing this, Why were they drained?

Davis Balestracci’s picture

By: Davis Balestracci

Any improvement effort ultimately faces the issue of standardizing processes, in many cases under the intense pressure of an impending certification audit. Ask yourself: Is your rationale for standardization merely to pass the audit, or is it a serious effort to improve quality?

Davis Balestracci’s picture

By: Davis Balestracci

Because many organizations are trying for formal certification, the pressure is on to standardize and document processes. This is also true for any robust improvement effort. Organizations are currently drowning in processes that have evolved over time and consequently become rife with confusion, conflict, complexity, and chaos. There are wide gaps between how these processes should work and how they actually do work.

Davis Balestracci’s picture

By: Davis Balestracci

Any article about control charts leads to inevitable (and torturous) discussions of special cause tests—all nine of them. No wonder confused people continue to use things like trend lines. But I’m getting ahead of myself.

Davis Balestracci’s picture

By: Davis Balestracci

Finally, the medical industry is putting aside its “We’re medicine; we’re different” mindset and taking a more practical look at quality improvement. Bravo! Although an element of physician culture remains convinced that improvement is all about outcomes and double-blind clinical trials, the executive culture at least has become so well-versed in quality jargon they can now use it to disguise a cost-cutting program. They’ve caught up with the rest of American management.

Davis Balestracci’s picture

By: Davis Balestracci

My March 30, 2011 article ended with wisdom from Yogi Berra as a warning to the quality profession. Some prickly reactions to it got me thinking about the last 30 years or so of quality improvement.

You can create content!

  • Classifieds
  • File Share
  • Forum Topic
  • Events
  • Links

Sign In to get started!

Quality Information