Jeffrey H. Eves and Tim Hack  |  12/02/2008

Jeffrey H. Eves and Tim Hack’s default image

The State of ISO 14001

A review of the global trends and benefits of this environmental management system standard

Other manufacturing industries, such as food, electronics, and petrochemicals, have seen steady growth in ISO 14001 certification. Some service industries with growth include retail, air transportation, engineering, and governmental agencies. Pushing ISO 14001 down to suppliers isn’t strictly limited to the automotive industry; for instance, it’s anticipated that a number of retail giants will require certification of their suppliers. Requiring suppliers to provide ISO 14001 certificates can be more cost-effective than administering and implementing proprietary audit schemes.

The increase of global numbers is also driven by corporate requirements for ISO 14001 certification. European and Asian companies are noted for requiring this. It’s seen not only as the right thing to do, but can also provide a competitive advantage in terms of lower costs and increased efficiency. The corporate requirement is a significant reason for certification in areas and markets where growth isn’t otherwise realized. It’s anticipated that this phenomenon will spur growth from competition, as certification becomes a deciding factor in choices made by customers.

The far-reaching benefits of EMS implementation have been proven in several studies worldwide. The following are abstracts from several studies that look at the organizational value of an EMS as well as suggestions for how best to implement an EMS in conjunction with other types of quality management systems.

United States

A wide range of benefits--in addition to benefits to the environment--resulting from the implementation of an EMS were identified in material published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of the Federal Environmental Executive:

Fewer environmental incidents, and reduction of impact and response time when incidents occur

More efficient use of resources

Better awareness of the effect on the environment, allowing the workforce to make more informed decisions

Increased suggestions and initiatives

Additional opportunities to recognize and award performance

Increased opportunities for delegation of responsibility

Improved employee morale

Improved customer service

Enhanced compliance to, or better understanding of, root causes of noncompliance

Better communication and relationships with all stakeholders

(“EMS Implementation Steps and System Benefits,” Office of the Federal Environmental Executive, 2003, www.ofee.gov/ems/training/August_8_Implementation_Training_Session.ppt )

Discuss

Jeffrey H. Eves and Tim Hack’s default image

About The Author

Jeffrey H. Eves is EMS/OHS program manager for Intertek’s U.S. and Canadian Systems Certification operations. His background includes 14 years of industrial hygiene and environmental consulting experience, and four years in the pulp and paper industry.

Tim Hack is technical manager for Intertek’s Systems Certification operations in the United Kingdom. He has worked extensively in product conformity assessment and has also performed quality, environmental, and occupational safety management systems audits in many countries worldwide, mainly in the electrotechnical sector.

You can create content!


  • Classifieds
  • File Share
  • Forum Topic
  • Events
  • Links

Sign In to get started!

Quality Information