Six Sigma promoters and innovation advocates have emerged as opposing camps in the battle for tool supremacy in the organization improvement wars. As Business Week said in “Six Sigma: So Yesterday?” and “At 3M, A Struggle Between Efficiency and Creativity,” which described how GE, Home Depot, 3M, Young & Rubicam, and Intuit are distancing themselves from traditional Six Sigma, “The reason [Six Sigma] caught fire was its effectiveness in cutting costs and improving profitability; that makes it a powerful tool—if those are a company’s goals. But as innovation becomes the cause du jour, companies are increasingly confronting the side effects of a Six Sigma culture…Once a company has done the requisite belt-tightening,…kick-starting the top line becomes paramount; the best way there apart from acquisition is innovation.”
Here are the results of my experience integrating Six Sigma and innovation:
An organization that excels at idea generation fails if it can’t select the best of those ideas and then effectively and efficiently implement them. An organization that focuses entirely on eliminating waste is in the futile pursuit of saving itself rich. World-class organizations are able to balance and meld innovation and operational excellence.