An organization may scale up by venturing into several products, responding to high customer demand and ramp up to 10 times the current head count
Or
Due to poor economic condition, scale down a 10,000 employee organization to a 1000 employee organization.
The Quality Management System should not lose its effectiveness or integrity in either direction of scalability.
While designing and implementing Quality Management system, what are the critical criteria that need to be kept in mind to achieve this scalability?
Thanks,
GR
Sign In to get started!
Comments
dld 1/25/2001
Your problem could have many answers. I will give you one that may have some relevance for you or for others. Several years ago I used to sit in on staff meetings chaired by the plant manager where defects, part shortages and schedule slips, etc. were the topic of the day. These problems were documented on reports that we all received at these meetings. The reports even listed the responsible manager's name. But, the problem level stayed high despite these managers being fully aware of its devastating negative impact on quality, productivity and customer attitudes. These problem levels became the "norm," something we just had to learn to live with. An industrial engineer persuaded the plant manager to set-up a prominent sign near the front door of the office area. It listed the managers' names and the number of unresolved problems assigned to each one. There were howls of protest but the plant manager held his ground. The sign (scoreboard) stayed. The effect shocked even me. Problems that "had to be lived with" suddenly started going away. Managers who had kept the rest of their organization at arms length suddenly had reason to "team" with their people (at all levels) to get good results. Neither the managers nor the other people in their organizations wanted negative publicity. Better yet, the same managers who were always on the hot seat were now getting positive strokes for their improvements. The "scoreboard" turned out to be a good friend for everybody, especially the customers.
dramoz 1/31/2001
At my old company I used the Corrective Action Program to ensure compliance. A corrective action response (CAR) was assigned to any employee in the company in order to resolve issues. If a response to the corrective action was not received by the given time frame the system I had set up would flag it as delinquent. After 1 more attempt to get a response and corrective action in place if the issue was still not corrected, the CAR would then be elevated to the employee's manager or supervisor. I even went so far as to assign them, on more than one occasion, to the President of the company. It only took a couple of times for it to sink in that I meant business and the documented system was going to be enforced. The system worked so well that even our Surveillance Auditors (Registrar's) were impressed.